Profile of Nuclear Arbitor

that's debatable right now. they have (for all intents and purposes) the same pen. what differentiates them is the first rate (the pak has a ~~1-0.3 seconds faster fire rate, 5dps) and the durability. the biggest difference between the use of the two is the units they face.

AT guns and the m8 require t2 or t3 and both take a while to kill it, which would be fine except it forces me to camp just outside the bunker range in order to allow them to shell. the pack howitzer is just to damn inaccurate to hit anything with the barrage and has the same issue as the at gun if i tell it to attack ground.

i haven't really tried the flaktrack yet but and it would probably work if i was just fighting OKH, but OKW shreks really cause that thing a lot of problems, especially when they can get into attack range.

smoke i have just about 0 luck with against bunkers (but it's great against setup teams) and i'm looking at spending 80 mun on smoke plus 90-120 on demos (if i have engineers) or bazookas.

the issue is usually that it locks down the better parts of the map early, which gives the enemy a resource advantage, and then forces me to prepare for tanks with reduced income. stopping them from getting bunkers up early is tough, especially when the OKH player is pair with OKW sturmpios. the first 60 mun comes pretty fast, i use it for fighting positions quite often, and if my ally isn't also in the area with all their troops i just can't push off spios and grens. at that point we both entrench on either side and then i have to destroy them.

rostov is by far the worst map.

but not always, as i haven't seen that yet and i've had my tanks get stuck on each other and everything else plenty. i also had a WC51 block a kubel today.

last i heard weapons fired through smoke had a higher chance to miss as well.