I feel that some of the doctrine-specified armors have unsuitable tech requirements.
The first armor comes to my mind is Hetzer. Hetzer is an AI armor which works best at middle stage of the game, but Panzer HQ is a late stage tech building. Why would anyone build a AI light-medium armor in the late stage of the game? I would suggest to move it to Mech HQ, so we can have an alternative choice aside from Luchs to do the AI work.
The second armor comes to my mind is M10, this guy doesn't have enough penetration to counter Axis' late armors while flanking is too risky in late stage. Maybe we should merge this guy into Captain's roster?
The last one is OKW Ostwind, I don't think this guy fit with any tech buildings we got here. Maybe move it to the Command HQ and give it a CP requirement.
T34/85, M4E8 and M4/76mm looks fine for me, they have same tech requirements with their base versions.
Doctrine-specified armor tech requirements
9 Dec 2018, 23:19 PM
#1
Posts: 261
PAGES (1)

1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
|
|
|
77 | ||
|
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
94 | ||
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.816139.854+4
- 2.47369.873+8
- 3.926310.749+6
- 4.246100.711+3
- 5.412215.657+1
- 6.404289.583+2
- 7.744450.623+1
- 8.373195.657+3
- 9.1307729.642+1
- 10.347136.718-1
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
16
Download
2749
Board Info
719 users are online:
719 guests
0 post in the last 24h
1 post in the last week
17 posts in the last month
1 post in the last week
17 posts in the last month
Registered members: 64658
Welcome our newest member, tuyensinhviet3qj
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM
Welcome our newest member, tuyensinhviet3qj
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM