Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » Lobby » Commander Revamp concerns

Commander Revamp concerns

PAGES (2)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
MrBananaGrabber.
23 Nov 2017, 16:31 PM
#21
avatar of MrBananaGrabber.
Patrion 26

Posts: 328

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Nov 2017, 09:47 AMnigo
The eastern revamp is better than the british "revamp".


The Tank Hunter commander has certainly been improved a lot, which is very welcome. But I doubt anyone would pick it more than they used to.
Especially now that Ambush Tactics, IL-2 call-in, and Guards have been improved, which will make all the commanders that have those better - which includes most of the main SU commanders people most frequently use.

I really can't see anyone bothering with 'Guard Rifle Combined Arms Tactics' as although it has some interesting stuff and has been improved, it just isn't useful enough to be worth using, compared to all the alternative better commanders.
Which is also why although these commanders are without a doubt being improved, their overall themes mean they just aren't a good or worth while choice compared to much better commanders.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
MrBananaGrabber.
23 Nov 2017, 17:10 PM
#22
avatar of MrBananaGrabber.
Patrion 26

Posts: 328

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Nov 2017, 11:31 AMJubimir
Would be great to have a USF Pershing+ShermanE8 commander. Soviets already have a t34/85+IS2 commander - I always play with that.

Or is that too much?


That's the kind of drastic change (or revamp) to a commander I was hoping we'd from the revamps.

The 'Recon Support Company' is basically rubbish, if they tweak that and keep it as a light recon and mainly inf based commander, it will remain a totally weak commander that would be a waste of a commander slot.

This is the perfect commander for an actual revamp. They could change it to 'Armoured Support Company'. They could massively buff the M8 so that it's like a lessor Puma (as someone else has suggested), and replace 'Airdropped Combat Group' with a Pershing.
The fact that only one US commander has access to the Pershing is a farce and a huge waste of the unit.
And finally, swap Pathfinders with Assault Engineers.

If the existing weak commanders are only tweaked, although they will be improved, they will most likely still remain much weaker choices, compared to the most popular commanders.

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ZombiFrancis
23 Nov 2017, 17:32 PM
#23
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

In what you've shown there, I feel like a Priest might be more fitting than a Pershing to be perfectly honest.

It'd give that Recon Sweep a purpose. Or if the Recon sweep revealed cloaked units, as it's a sweep, not a loiter...

I dunno. The commander system itself is what makes balancing individual commanders a challenge IMO. Unless that's overhauled, commander balance will likely be a moving target.
Strategic Territory Points Mod:
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=604491510
Classic resource points!
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
MrBananaGrabber.
23 Nov 2017, 18:34 PM
#24
avatar of MrBananaGrabber.
Patrion 26

Posts: 328

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Nov 2017, 17:32 PMZombiFrancis
In what you've shown there, I feel like a Priest might be more fitting than a Pershing to be perfectly honest.

It'd give that Recon Sweep a purpose. Or if the Recon sweep revealed cloaked units, as it's a sweep, not a loiter...

I dunno. The commander system itself is what makes balancing individual commanders a challenge IMO. Unless that's overhauled, commander balance will likely be a moving target.



Ideally it would be great to have more commanders that have access to the Priest/Pershing.
Only having one commander for each unit is a waste of game content and gameplay potential.

I doubt Relic will be adding any new commanders to the game (even though they would probably sell better than DOW3), so the 'revamp' is realistically the only way to get drastically better commanders into the game.

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
aomsinzana
23 Nov 2017, 23:08 PM
#25
avatar of aomsinzana

Posts: 284 | Subs: 1

Plz no Pershing, I prefer more durable 76mm Sherman Jumbo would fit the role better.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
ferwiner
24 Nov 2017, 01:13 AM
#26
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Nov 2017, 23:08 PMaomsinzana
Plz no Pershing, I prefer more durable 76mm Sherman Jumbo would fit the role better.


There is absolutely no chance for any new models to be added to the game. So you can forget about jumbo.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (2)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » Lobby » Commander Revamp concerns

Livestreams

Treadz
 unknown 14
manthestars
 South Africa 0
Velmarg
 unknown 9
tightrope
 New Zealand 8

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
7
 Download
Download
734
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

445 users are online: 445 guests
8 posts in the last 24h
48 posts in the last week
148 posts in the last month
Registered members: 44917
Welcome our newest member, shazam casino
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM