Login

russian armor

Quality of life changes for OKW

9 Aug 2016, 01:11 AM
#21
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742

All 3 ideas seem good to me.



You are missing the point entirely. 'asymmetrical balance' doesn't mean some factions need to be missing a key capability. Look at sov vs OH, or US vs Wehr in CoH1. Both are considered the most balanced and interesting matchups. Both factions are similar in terms of available units, yet there is sufficient difference in tech structure, unit abilities, relative strengths to keep things interesting.


Exactly. Rock, paper, scissors is pretty boring if your opponent can't play rock and you can't play paper.
9 Aug 2016, 01:17 AM
#22
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1



Exactly. Rock, paper, scissors is pretty boring if your opponent can't play rock and you can't play paper.

Arm wrestle instead then.

...I'll stop now.
9 Aug 2016, 05:25 AM
#23
avatar of MissCommissar

Posts: 673

All 3 ideas seem good to me.



You are missing the point entirely. 'asymmetrical balance' doesn't mean some factions need to be missing a key capability. Look at sov vs OH, or US vs Wehr in CoH1. Both are considered the most balanced and interesting matchups. Both factions are similar in terms of available units, yet there is sufficient difference in tech structure, unit abilities, relative strengths to keep things interesting.


Hah, that's what I usualy write, when suggesting to redesign Maxim HMG into typical defensive MG, like MG-42. But then I getting a lot of answers, some part of them is about "it is assymetrical balance, it is design feature, stop suggesting BS". Cute to see, that absolutely same in logic suggestion, but for another faction, people taking soo kindly...

If "suckeable by design" Maxim is design and assymetrical balance feature - so absence of OKW smoke is. I wouldn't say, that OKW suffers too much without smoke - keep in mind, that for that OKW getting a lot of interesting things, which are unavailable for all other factions, for example - IR Eye of Sauron. And LeIG itself is not mortar, it has way bigger range of fire, it can damage light and medium vehicles. It provides all nessecary support. OKW may deal with HMGs without smoke - using those LeIGs, early coming Wuhrframmens, trying flnaking attacks, cos even if you will fail - forward retreat point will save a lot of time for you for to make next try...

Again - OKW have everything they need for to effectively deal with HMGs. Adding more seems a bit unreasonable. LeIG is good enough even right now, I use it very often, it helps a lot even in auto-fire mode. And of course, I have problems with HMGs, when I play as OKW, but... that's part of factions design. Such as USSR will have problems with early light vehicles attacks, if they took T1 instead of T2.
9 Aug 2016, 06:27 AM
#24
avatar of easierwithaturret

Posts: 247



[post]



I'm not going to get drawn into a debate on the concept of asymmetrical balance, that has already been discussed at length over the years. I get it, you think the Maxim is UP (and perhaps it is), but this thread is not about that. All I will say is that to deny a useful abiliy with the potential to open up new strats and add variety to the game, just because other factions also have that ability doesn't make sense to me. Plus adding more utility to a unit seems a better way to balance it than just upping its stats which are already ok.
9 Aug 2016, 06:37 AM
#25
avatar of miragefla
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13

I'd be willing to accept smoke rounds as the start, if to compensate for the fact the ISG is terrible versus garrisons and actually harming the structure. If they can be smoked off, then the ISG can at least help OKW's massive issue with garrisons and defensive positions when using the Battlegroup HQ.

The Battlegroup HQ, as it stands, needs considerable help as an actual tier structure rather than mainly being a beefier Forward Assembly with healing.


And LeIG itself is not mortar, it has way bigger range of fire, it can damage light and medium vehicles. It provides all nessecary support.


And in general its worse against anything not emplacements and mortars can also damage vehicles as well. The ISG just as a tad easier time hitting them due to its arc, but it's a very minor thing as it has much worse AOE and the target needs to be stationary in general. There's a reason the old Hollow Charge rounds were never used.
9 Aug 2016, 06:57 AM
#26
avatar of MissCommissar

Posts: 673

I'd be willing to accept smoke rounds as the start, if to compensate for the fact the ISG is terrible versus garrisons and actually harming the structure. If they can be smoked off, then the ISG can at least help OKW's massive issue with garrisons and defensive positions when using the Battlegroup HQ.

The Battlegroup HQ, as it stands, needs considerable help as an actual tier structure rather than mainly being a beefier Forward Assembly with healing.



And in general its worse against anything not emplacements and mortars can also damage vehicles, the ISG just as a tad easier time hitting them due to its arc, but it's a very minor thing as it has much worse AOE.


ISG is terrible versus garrisons, but Flamennades are perfectly fine, for example. Wuhrframmen is ubereffective against garrisons - just crushing buildings with troops inside. So, what problems may you have with them?

Idea of "smoking off" garrisons is a bit wierd, never saw anyone, who would smoke it, instead of attacking and punching units out of there. Just throw there 1-2 flammennades and it will be 100% clear, no need to smoke it or do something more, seriously.

Battlegroup HQ is also fine, if you will look at todays faction design. You can get it pretty fast, cos it costs not so many. With that you getting 5th unit in T0 (is there any other faction, which has so many units in starting tier?), you getting all kinds of units, all kinds of counters for everything - from infantry (HMG, infantry, FlaK HT(may sound like a joke, but still)) to tanks (Puphen, SPioAT, Volksfausts). Even without tiers OKW has more, than any other faction, with T1 they also getting very effective indirect also. Personally, I see no reasons to build T2 for myself, cos light vehicles suck, Wuhrframmen costs too much and I'd prefer to save my fuel for T3 and a bit early comming vehicle core of OKW - Pz4s and Panthers. But, that's my own build for games.

In any case - Battlegroup HQ is fine, with that OKW very fast gets everything they need. Getting higher tiers only opens for you tanks. Yet I still think, that if we need to pay for medics additional 100MP - why not to let FRP on BGHQ cost 100 MP less? It all just costs too much...

And in general, it's not worse than usual non-doc mortar. Mediocre accuracy, fine damage, never saw, that mortars can damage medium vehicles like LeIG or packhowie and it's AoE is also fine. It's not so big, as mortars, but... mortars has lesser range, lesser penetration. It is an exchange - range and power to areal damage. Balancing. For non-doc and early coming field howitzer (pack howie comes later, costs more and less mobile, and for that - more effective, so uncompareable) LeIG does it's job veeeeery well. It counters enemy mortar teams, enemy HMG teams, able to snipe from fog opponent's vehicles. Has problems with garrisons, but as I said - flamenades, wuhrframmens, sneaky encircling tactics - all of that can be used effectively against them, so use it. And no need to make OKW's gameplay easier, it already became so with getting non-doc HMG. Save some work for OKW players and some uniqness of that faction. That new patch almost ruined it already. Add smoke and it will be not 70% copy of Ostheer, but all 80%. Is that, what we want in faction designing? Definitely no!
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

456 users are online: 456 guests
9 posts in the last 24h
39 posts in the last week
151 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45060
Welcome our newest member, Lcfvfeeaka
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM