Should the SU76 cost fuel?
13 Feb 2015, 22:32 PM
#21
Posts: 2779
Holyshit, stop spamming bullshit poll thread.
13 Feb 2015, 22:44 PM
#22
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
No. I would not call it in even if it gives me fuel for calling it! I mean, the role of this unit is not clear. Is it AT, well at mark 15 minutes it can't even penetrate a PzIV. Is it AI, why not katyusha?
Bottom line, even if you reduce the fuel price by half, it's still useless. Need a total rework.
Bottom line, even if you reduce the fuel price by half, it's still useless. Need a total rework.
14 Feb 2015, 01:40 AM
#23

8 Posts: 2470
su76 barrage is really good against infantry with limited maneuver room. if you ever base pin someone on a map like semiosky you can end the game early with one. that's literally the only use though, other than trolling.
14 Feb 2015, 02:10 AM
#24
Posts: 2053
No, it should cost munitions MVGame.
Su-76 needs a role. It was used to support infantry. In this game, it is the one that needs to be supported by everything.
Su-76 needs a role. It was used to support infantry. In this game, it is the one that needs to be supported by everything.
14 Feb 2015, 09:33 AM
#25
Posts: 1740
Yes to no fuel or yes to a good idea? Which is it?
THIS!!!
This poll is confusing as fuck. I think 95% voted with the same thing in mind.
14 Feb 2015, 09:43 AM
#26
Posts: 3293
yes
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
|
|
|
1035 | ||
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.817140.854-1
- 2.48270.873+6
- 3.1122398.738+13
- 4.449227.664+4
- 5.553350.612+3
- 6.23159.797+8
- 7.1386761.646+8
- 8.348124.737+2
- 9.11830.797+5
- 10.430306.584-1
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
18
Download
3330



Failure is always an
It's a happy
To make most awesome thing in universe combine 
and remember kids, we didn't start the 