Login

russian armor

Can Axis turn the game

by Yope 26th March 2016, 21:36 PM
Honor
Honor it
1
Chat
Show Chat
Patch: 3.0.0.21040
Duration: 00:33:30
26 Mar 2016, 21:37 PM
#1
avatar of Yope

Posts: 33

Against good players .. rank 27, 3, 90, 90
27 Mar 2016, 06:25 AM
#2
avatar of Loxley

Posts: 223

90 is not good ^^ Even when you lose some games, you are not on 90. You have to lose more often.
27 Mar 2016, 09:51 AM
#3
avatar of Erico

Posts: 68

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Mar 2016, 06:25 AMLoxley
90 is not good ^^ Even when you lose some games, you are not on 90. You have to lose more often.
hi chinese guy,can you stop your words to make the people hate the chinese,plz?
27 Mar 2016, 11:15 AM
#4
avatar of Loxley

Posts: 223

Why hate ? After 10 games in 4on4, your team will be between rank 5-60, it depends vs which teams you won. You have to lose many games, to be on position 90 only. Ok, in 4on4 random it takes more time than 10 games, to reach it. I admit, as allies, even rank 90 players can handle op stuff to win vs good axis teams, so, good performance with that win. :)
27 Mar 2016, 19:31 PM
#5
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Mar 2016, 11:15 AMLoxley
Why hate ? After 10 games in 4on4, your team will be between rank 5-60, it depends vs which teams you won. You have to lose many games, to be on position 90 only. Ok, in 4on4 random it takes more time than 10 games, to reach it. I admit, as allies, even rank 90 players can handle op stuff to win vs good axis teams, so, good performance with that win. :)


hey loxely how about you stfu when you don't understand that those two were rank 90 AT (2v2) and it is different with 4v4. keep quiet and stfu when you don't understand how it works. 2v2 AT rank 90 is different with what you described or think.

Ok so I can see in your playercard that your 2v2 AT with (◣╬◢) PzDiv Viper ✠ rank is 117!

https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/viewBoard/2/steamid/76561198010254130

so according to you, and considering that they were rank 90, and you are rank 117, then they are still better than you!
27 Mar 2016, 21:17 PM
#6
avatar of Sturmpanther
Lead Strategist Badge

Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

jump backJump back to quoted post27 Mar 2016, 06:25 AMLoxley
90 is not good ^^ Even when you lose some games, you are not on 90. You have to lose more often.


As aladin allready wrote :)
I agree rank 90 in 4vs4 AT is not very well (you get it with 8/2 btw). But rank 90 in 2vs2 AT is much harder to hold; especially with 2 randoms mates in 4vs4)
Did you watched it, before you wrote soemthing? The 2vs2 AT rank 90 were both forest and won vs the 2 OKW players.

Both USA, rank 3 and 27 were city vs 2 Ostheer.

Allies on liene Forest :)
28 Mar 2016, 06:41 AM
#7
avatar of Loxley

Posts: 223

When the game was balanced (before brits), it was no big deal. I played 2on2 with BigZ long time ago as allies, after 10 games rank 90 too, then we never played again. But I know, you write always they are good enemies, when you won. And when we win, it was axis map or enemy was bad or 1 of them was drunken or something. :D
28 Mar 2016, 10:02 AM
#8
avatar of Aladdin

Posts: 959

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2016, 06:41 AMLoxley
When the game was balanced (before brits)


lol Can you find only one more person in the community who thinks like you and doesn't think axis was OP as fuck in 4v4 before Brits? game was balanced?! lol I am considering using this sentence as my signature lol
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

419 users are online: 419 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
11 posts in the last week
61 posts in the last month
Registered members: 46379
Welcome our newest member, KANYAMASULE JOCKUS
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM