Profile of Australian Magic

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198105012992


Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks15 Feb 2015, 22:22 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2015, 17:44 PMAlexzandvar Sturms just aren't the insane infantry killing machines they used to be since they got a big nerf to survivability. Come on, in my last 2v2 I had 32kills with single SP squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks15 Feb 2015, 13:35 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2015, 13:30 PMPorygon It was like that since COH1, I think it is always like that. Veto is just letting you avoid the map if the searching is full of players of the level, if the system cannot find guys around your ELO, it started to search better and worse players and neglecting your map veto. If veto always works, it means 1) you are scrubs, because there are plenty of them 2) or you are very lucky By your stats, you know which one you are. Said the guy who is playing 1v1 for ages. I started 1v1s month or 2 ago. Give me some credtis dude. I wonder your stats in such moment. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks15 Feb 2015, 13:19 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2015, 13:15 PMPorygon If and only if the coding is written right, the veto is "working as intended". Ive seen many threads and posts about not-working vetos but I really doubt it. I guess it's more probably that vetos have been removed and you did not notice. I have a way over 1000h and my votes are working as intended since 1h. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks15 Feb 2015, 13:12 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2015, 13:06 PMPorygon Oh jeez not this Stalingrad joke again, if your Soviet lose to OKW of your level in that map, uninstall the game and shoot yourself. I have no idea what are you talking about. I just said that all players who are playing Axis, have Stalingrad in veto list so you won't play on this map with Allies. But it still does not change the fact that vetted Obers with Stgs are better at close range than vetted Shocks In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks15 Feb 2015, 12:59 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2015, 12:46 PMPorygon Biggest lie and worst game design in COH2. Yeah yeah, better DPS at long range, worse DPS at short. ROFL, the Allies must be high enough to engagment Gren and Volks at longest range in every engagment, FFS. Squad skirmish win/lose should depends on cover and positioning, not this kind of nonsense, it just automatically making the short range infantry win because there are so many CQB-ish map design. I did not say a word about short range cons advantage but its only 17 for cons vs 16 for volks. CQ units have no place cause Stalingrad is in veto list and the most breaking unit, Obers, can wipe Shock and Paras before they reach them and even then, if they have stgs they have dps form 62 to 14. Now imagine Shocks with dps 70-30-10. Game breaking unit, right? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks15 Feb 2015, 12:37 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2015, 12:19 PMPorygon ^ Yeah, only if they have 5 G43 and they actually know how to shoot DAFUG are you smoking, Volks AI is BAD, they even lose to Cons in all engagement. And the guy who said USF indirect fire sucks, I dunno what games was he actually playing, neglecting Walking Stuka USF have the best squad wiping indirect fire machine. That's weird since Volks have higher DPS at long range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pure cons spam.15 Feb 2015, 11:40 AM stupid post. In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: Pure cons spam.15 Feb 2015, 09:56 AM Thank You for all tips! I will try them! In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: What is stopping you from playing 1vs1 games?15 Feb 2015, 09:38 AM Ostheer: Fact that from begginig Im one unit behind OKW: Nothing. But I don't like them. USF: Kubel and late-game. SU: Nothing. Best 1v1 faction. General: Capping points instead of regular frontline and slow pushing forward. In: Lobby
Thread: Remove Shreck from Volks15 Feb 2015, 09:33 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2015, 07:53 AMAlexzandvar Giving Sturms 2 shreks isn't going to make shreks any less of a problem, you will have a starting unit with them. You could give a totally new OKW starting unit shreks and the same issue would exist. The reason the shrek exists for OKW early game is that OKW specifically lacks fuel based AT, that's it. There isn't some out the ass complicated justification for shreks existing on a starting unit, it's clear as day. The first dedicated anti armor platform you can build is at a 135 fuel at reduced income from a HQ you need to build. And making said anti armor platform robs you of other options. KT isn't the root of OKW's problems, it's just exacerbated by the fact that you don't have much between the starting units and a KT that you need to build or can build. Most games a OKW player will be forced to spend fuel in order to say alive, and they will have to spend it wisely. The whole saving and delaying for a KT puts OKW in a hard spot because they will be lacking vehicle platforms to counter the numerous mediums and other vehicles allies can produce. As long as the fuel penalty exists people will always be extremely picky with what they make, and they will make game winners not game changers, get what I'm saying? Yes it is, because it will stop blobs. I though that Puma is cheaper than Jadgpanzer so why you sau that first unit is Jadgpanzer? Puma can hit the field in less than one minute after M20 so what's the problem? Not to mention that in 1v1 Jadgpanzer can hit the field in 10-12min to fight against Sherman/T34 so where is this lower fuel income and lack of AT? KT is the problem. This unit should be doctrinal. It's like giving SU non-doc IS2 after 3 tiers so you can pick up doctrine with B4 and combne it with IS2, sounds OP? Now, since OKW is floating with manpowerm it's not big deal to make KT and cover it with Pak43. I did it countless times. I even help my enemy to flank my KT so my Pak43 can snipe his tanks. KT+Pak43 - the biggest OPness. Let's wait for a OST doctrine with Pak43 and Tiger Ace, it would be excatly the same. In: COH2 Balance