Profile of DonnieChan

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2275 | Subs: 1

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/donniechan


Thread: Ostheer T4 Non-Combat Grenadier Buff Idea20 Feb 2020, 21:36 PM the main problem is the wipes by sherman/IS2/scott which is caused by the 4 man type inf In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Non-Combat Grenadier Buff Idea20 Feb 2020, 12:13 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2020, 23:45 PMmiragefla Main issue with 5 men Grenadiers at this point is stacking on the LMG which would make it one of the strongest infantry units in the game since you'd have to chew through 4 models to reach the LMG and Grenadiers per model have good stats. This is on top of being a snare squad with rifle grenades. One the ideas we've been thinking of ideas, but it's not the easiest as it might stack too much power, but we will see what turns out. We've talked about things like faster cap speeds end game after T4 so Ost will start pushing the offensive; reinforce has been discussed, though there was talk about a global cost reduction on Ostheer infantry in reinforce. what about the option to add 5th member by cancelling out the mg42 when in t4, just like the doctrine. give the doctrine something else in return In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Non-Combat Grenadier Buff Idea19 Feb 2020, 22:24 PM What is the problem with the 5 men Grenadier in t4 again? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Non-Combat Grenadier Buff Idea19 Feb 2020, 22:23 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2020, 10:46 AMPrinceps OST has no inf problem in the lategame ... Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2020, 10:46 AMPrinceps OST has no inf in the lategame ... fixed your sentence In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stale ASF Wher meta19 Feb 2020, 22:20 PM 1. playercard pls 2. try wehr yourself if the MG42 is so OP In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mainline infantry sandbags change19 Feb 2020, 20:57 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2020, 00:31 AMdistrofio Since mainline infantries like Volks,cons, IS, riflemen (doctrinally) and grens (bunkers) are able to build their own cover the mechanic is kind of important to simply remove it. Therefore instead of removing the ability i would like to prupose a change, into a more defensive theme. Except for cons and grens, Instead of "building" sandbags (like engineers do) they now "spawn" a single, circular sandbag pile big enough to cover at least 3 or 4 models, like the ones in the capture points. This skill will have a big enough cooldown and will have a time to set up aswell. Thoughs? i'm sorry, no this sounds like a Command and Conquer Solution or solution for any boring rts luckily this isnt command and conquer In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Have mines give munitions when swept19 Feb 2020, 20:48 PM no, sweeping mines is easy and rewarding enough In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Additional 10% armor bonus for panther at vet310 Feb 2020, 13:44 PM i think the biggest problems with tanks is always accuracy In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brummbar Shell Speed8 Feb 2020, 17:19 PM i want the old 2013 speed In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are they not fixing heavies?8 Feb 2020, 13:01 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2020, 21:24 PMLago It'd definitely help, but then you're creating a almost wholly doctrinal tech tier. The main problem is the heavies do everything right now. They've got the anti-tank firepower of a tank destroyer, the anti-infantry firepower of a late-game anti-infantry vehicle, and a ton of health and armour on top of that. All for the cost of two medium tanks. They're simply just more cost effective than their price in other T4 vehicles. Personally, I think the solution is to put that proposed sidetech cost on the heavy itself. It'd have the same effect on the first heavy, and serve as a penalty for losing them. It's also much more straightforward to implement. Don't forget their biggest Plus : you don't have to micro multiple units I dunno why people forget that so often In: COH2 Balance