1. While informative on the nature of abilities and things Axis can abuse in 4's, it makes extremely little points about what tools Allies have in their arsenal in order to even the odds.Things like USF pop cap abuse, call in meta fuckery, and whatnot all can swing the tide in the favor of Allies late game in order to make up for the perceived weakness in stock units. If you assume Axis players make smart choices in doctrine, and Allies make dumb choices in doctrine then of course Axis players will win, but if both sides pick the correct doctrines then the odds will be much much more even. Picking horrible doctrines in 3's and 4's as Axis will mess you up very hard if your facing opponents using meta doctrines like IS2's, 85's or ISU with mark target, P-47's, Priests, ect.
2. If you want to write an actually informative post on 3's and 4's you need to come at it from a neutral perspective rather than an assumption of weakness on the Allies part and assumption of strength on the Axis part.
1. he never said allies dont have tools. he said axis synergises better. and did not assume that allies players were making dumb choices, he was pointing out how every choice allies players make have bigger risk. are you gonna infest this thread now too?
2. it is funny how it is ohme who keep making us, the crew, play germans when we just wanna play allies. please read then post and yes, you can come at it from "an assumption of weakness on the Allies part and assumption of strength on the Axis part." when you have a wall of text that actually back your statement up. unlike your thousands of posts ignoring facts, nitpicking facts and just enormous amount of ignorance to valid arguments put up against you.