Profile of FestiveLongJohns

Everyone that comments on this topics like this from vetlolcake are simply encouraging posts like these, myself included. Can we all agree to boycott these threads, and not give these topics the attention that they don't deserve?

Run a ahk script, right click on the ahk icon in the windows task bar -> Open. Then go to View -> Key history and script info. Press the buttons you want to identify and hit F5 to refresh the list.

o0 That is a super useful function! Thanks for the tip, also von your hotkeys were correct but for some reason they didn't work until I moved them to the top of my script.

Hmm, add me on steam and send me some replays (click my playercard icon). I'll check them out and we can see what we come up with. If you've been playing for a long time and have the basics down, you'll probably improve quickly with just a few tips/tweaks to your playstyle or build order. I'm not a pro player by any means, but I understand the basics of the game and can probably give you some insight.

My favourate potential solution is to just punish blobbing. The more of X you have in one area, the higher the accuracy penalty against them is. Make it so that rifle fire into blobs kills several people, or MG suppresses and tears into them. I hate that blobs can charge into machineguns and actually have a chance to win.

The logic of increased incoming accuracy is if 20 people are charging at you and you shoot back, even if you're a bad shot, you'll probably hit SOMEONE. It's so weird seeing an MG 42 or Maxim shoot into a large crowd of people and only kill a couple before being forced off.

I like this idea a lot, and actually suggested it on the alpha forums. Blobs require very limited tactical thought, and it makes sense both logically and from a game design stand point for there to be some sort of increase in leathlity based on the number of units in proximity. Hopefully something like this gets implemented.

It's not that everybody doesn't agree that things would be better if everybody was happy, cheerful, and kind all of the time. I'm sure you would have a very hard time finding someone who disagrees with that notion.

The problem here is that it's the internet, Seriously what did you actually expect? When given anonymity, some people will behave in an anti-social way just because they can without consequence. It's 2014 and if you haven't learned that by now, I'm not sure you will ever "get it."

To take it a step further, the reason you are being called a pussy isn't because of your moral high ground, It's because you seem to actually think that if you complain about it on the internet, the problem will somehow be fixed.

Just ignore it.

While its true that many people will never change, that doesn't mean that discussion can't open the eyes to a few. It might not even occur to some people, particularly young people, that their typed words have a real impact on someones mood. Isn't that how social change happens? Enough people decide that what is the socially accepted norm will no longer be tolerated, and people respond. I don't think this is 100% applicable to the internet because there is no way to enforce it. However, I don't think everyone online is a scumbag, even then people being a dick are likely just having a bad day or are upset about something else. Its the good people having a bad day that might take note of topics like this and plant the seed for better behavior. It certainly couldn't hurt, could it?


I think a negative experience sticks out in your memory much more than a positive one. You could have 100 neutral or positive experiences, and one negative, and everyone is going to both remember, and talk about the negative experience. Most of the games I play fall into the "neutral" category, where neither one of us says a whole lot to the other.