Profile of Clarity

Hey everybody, I have recently started using Armored Assault in 1v1 and although it is a useful commander with some good abilities, I struggle in the transition from the mid to late game. I find it hard to decipher whether to tech up for 85's or stall for an IS-2. I don't have the replays saved but I had a match where stalling for an IS-2 resulted in me losing my fuel(Arnhem Checkpoint) and not being able to recover, even after getting the IS-2. I guess the biggest question is when to wait for call-ins and when to tech up. Once the IS-2 comes out, I see many players tend to just float resources for a replacement IS-2. Is teching T4 just too much of risk? I like 85's but without Mark Target I feel they are just okay, better against armor than the 76's but about the same for AI in which it is very dependent. The rest of Soviet T4 is overall slightly UP at least in 1v1 with the T-34/76's not being very good unless they are in packs and the SU-85 being bad unless it gets Vet 2. I really only tech T4 for 85's with Mark Target(Guard Motor) and maybe a Katy if I really need it.

Wow, 120 mm mortars are delightful.....I hope my opponent has a fun time at Weenie Hut Juniors. Enjoy! GG WP!

I can dig it! Those M1919 RE's were no joke.

Yeah, sorry for not clarifying better. I just was curious which commander is stronger against the more common allied meta game. I have Lightning War, Close Air Support (not great in 1's anymore), and Mobile Defense. But thanks for your reply!

Pretty enjoyable match that showcases that USF Late Game is not too bad as long as you don't panic with your paper tanks. Some blobbing (rank 300's) but overall some good combined arms from us both. GG WP!