Profile of Alexzandvar

all about combined arms

If you don't support your KT or your Tiger I you will lose it, +5 range or not.

that low pen also make the 57mm useless against most Axis armor.

Did you not read my entire post

USF and Sov armor have less armor in general. So the 57mm would be more effectivess against the USF's own armor.

Exactly.

the pak40 do fire faster, and that's really the biggest advantage the pak40 have.

The biggest advantage the Pak40 has is TWP. Vet 0 a ZiS gun is a better option due to utility and durability, at Vet 1 the Pak40 is better because TWP is the shit.

Hm, can't find those numbers on coh2-stats. Where did you find those numbers?

The OKW Panther has a wind down time of 1 second, adding on to it's reload speed.

You are hopleless here. No point of keeping it.
Im showing how your logic is invalid and broken and you tell me that pak43 is out of meta, while it has nothing to do with it.

You made the point the Pak43 is the bests thing ever, and why would Axis need it if Allied armor isn't hard to penetrate and my rebuttal is that the Pak43 despite "being so awesome as penning" has been out of meta because killing it isn't hard for any faction.

Best at guns belong to axis yet they face paper armor for which is impossible to bounce Pak shell or even schreck (chance to bounce for E8 is just pure laught).

Churchill variants, KV series tanks, Comet, IS2, ISU....

Yet you say that IS should not have 45 because it's not facing 60 range, but you dont want to apply that logic to axis units.

I never said the IS2 shouldn't have 45 range. I just called out your silly comparison. The IS2 can already achieve 50 range with Vet 2.

Im saying about paper armour, you about amount of tanks. Again, you just jump around the point.

All medium armor in the game is paper to normal AT guns. It would be OP if Axis AT guns had a high ROF but lower penetration. You also just danced around the fact that the Rackten doesn't even have 60 range.

On the other hand bazooka and 57mm with bad penetration must face a lot bigger armour.

The 57mm needs to be buffed, no doubt, but the zook has gotten what it needed. Axis heavy armor is also not nearly as common as it used to be.

Yes, zis is good but still worse.

See Above; the ZiS has good utility and durability.

Plus, I dont take brits into this, because they are still during beta process.

lol I'm sure that relic will wipe every leaderboards to compensate right?

If you have ever captured a USF AT gun as OKW you will know nirvana as you cut through his tanks like nothing because the shit pen on it doesn't matter. Like if your trying to make the argument that Axis should have faster firing but lower pen AT guns your asking to make shit a lot harder for USF lol.

According to such logic, allies should have best AT Guns because they are dealing with highest armor.

Considering the only bad AT gun Allies have is the USF one....

But Hey, best at guns belong to axis despite they are dealing with paper armour most of the time.

The only medium in the game that can bounce normal AT gun shots is the OKW PIV and the Comet. Although arguably the Comet belongs in the same "Heavy" category as the Panther.

actually the KT get +16 sight at vet 4, meaning that it can sight for itself.

Good luck getting it to Vet 4.