Profile of NinjaWJ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2070

General Information


Thread: Panzer II Luchs18 Jan 2015, 06:48 AM Well going lt usf is asking for a luchs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts AT grenade and Axis panzerfausts18 Jan 2015, 05:16 AM i think faust cannot go through buildings if the tank reverses behind it In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Panzer Schwer HQ18 Jan 2015, 01:36 AM it's really difficult to push off <10 minutes, unless the OKW is not defending the HQ at all. The HQ also has massive range In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Well that stream was... sigh18 Jan 2015, 01:22 AM thank you for the clarification peter In: Lobby
Thread: Cynthia statement about the first 2015 stream18 Jan 2015, 01:05 AM user conduct on the stream was kind of lacking and immature, but i feel it is a product of relic's NDA and poor communication. Of course people are going to act crazy if there's no clear communication set by relic on where they are going/what is next. i think the behavior of the twitch users was expected. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW Panzer Schwer HQ17 Jan 2015, 19:59 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2015, 18:53 PMImagelessbean This unit (actually building) seems to be over performing. It can lock out infantry from whole sections of the map, is extremely effective at all ranges against all but heavy targets, and requires dedicated AT and fair amounts of time to destroy. To add insult to injury it can shoot at aircraft. Annoyingly, it is given as a gift for unlocking a tier. Meanwhile as Soviet I have to pick T3 or T4 and receive nothing in return. Wehr is no better off having to pay for unlocking a building but getting nothing in return. I would like to seriously discuss how this unit functions and if it should be changed. but bean, it's working as intended In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Well that stream was... sigh17 Jan 2015, 19:57 PM well said bloonok In: Lobby
Thread: Well that stream was... sigh17 Jan 2015, 18:40 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jan 2015, 18:25 PMJackiebrown I feel like they dumped WAY too much time and resources into AA. For a game that thrives of multiplayer there should have been some content for multi released along side it, even something small like a few commanders. Then after AA they pretty much jumped off the radar for over two months, and come back with a stream that says, "Hey we got cool stuff planned, but we can't say anything about it." Be a little more transparent, and they would do so much better. i think singleplayer ppl and compstomp audience is a bigger portion of the playerbase than the multiplayer peeps. In: Lobby
Thread: Well that stream was... sigh17 Jan 2015, 18:23 PM next time, they should not play while doing Q&A. i feel like they can't gve good responses when their attention is split In: Lobby
Thread: Well that stream was... sigh17 Jan 2015, 17:28 PM Someone asked why the flak HQ was so good against allied medium tanks. PQ's answer "why shouldn't it?" In: Lobby