Profile of Rollo

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 738

General Information
Steam: 76561198040750202


Thread: British question11 Aug 2015, 21:43 PM Brits will be standalone vs all other factions In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: sprice rekt by jove11 Aug 2015, 17:44 PM that diversity in units tho In: Replays
Thread: Stuart and Quad rush are pretty retarded,but....10 Aug 2015, 21:47 PM Do not be of nerfings to quad HT Use shrek tovarish l2p ))))) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ML-20 152mm Howitzer8 Aug 2015, 23:56 PM Just played a game where my opponent killed a PII and two squads reinforcing in HQ with a single barrage, then destroying my HQ buildings in the next minute or so. Loving this patch relic, it's really diversified gameplay now every game against soviets is a re-enactment of the battle of the Somme In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxims, Quad HT, ML-20, KV-88 Aug 2015, 23:44 PM And the joys of playing OKW vs sov this patch In: Replays
Thread: How to deal with M1919 and Defensive stance?8 Aug 2015, 16:32 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Aug 2015, 02:45 AMkamk Not a fan of MG34s I wouldn't recommend luft or fortifications against m1919's, rifles with LMG's can actually deploy def stance infront of a 34 and kill them due to superior DPS. Falls are also just a MP drain against them. ISG is a good shout though In: OKW Strategies
Thread: Stuart and Quad rush are pretty retarded,but....8 Aug 2015, 00:42 AM Buff the 222 too much and it will become OP, I think it's in a decent spot atm. Just slap a fuel price on the quad and make the T-70/SU-76 a tad bit more expensive. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Mines need looking at6 Aug 2015, 22:32 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2015, 22:15 PMMidconflict No this goes against everything people on the forums have been saying they want. This is why the call in meta was changed. People are sick a tired of being told that they can only play with a few commanders, or have to tech a certain way. Like i said Mine are and important part of CoH2 and were in CoH1, every faction in the game has access to mine with out tech, or commanders. All but the USF, so no just putting box mine in more commander would solve nothing, including the fact that you have to lay five in a clump to do any kind of damage to tanks. m20 mine with RE's will not be balanced, imagine trying to counter harass with an OKW PIV and having the entire map covered with them by midgame. With Soviet/OKW/Ost mines you can limp away, but when your tank is immobilized it's helpless which can often spell the end of the game. Having such a powerful weapon so easily available from the start with cheap units is not balanced, hence why reigels/m20 mines are locked behind vehicles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Mines need looking at6 Aug 2015, 21:41 PM Not sure how I feel about a 60 muni mine that can 100% immobilize any tank being built with RE's, it's like giving pios reigals. Mines like that were barred behind doctrines/vehicles for a reason. As for the box mine, just put it in more doctrines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 1v1 balance issues.5 Aug 2015, 20:05 PM I'm not really surprised allies are leading so far in the 1vs1 stats. If you take a look at things only Allied light vehicles were really changed, flak track still has the same fuel price while both allied light tanks feild faster thanks to the T3 adjustments. In: COH2 Balance