What my argument was stating is that the guy was complaining how he was losing a model by indirect fire. I didn't want to think about that because of course that stuff happens, most of the times worse in my case.
What I meant to say is that all indirect fire has a knack to annoy the living hell out of you. No matter which faction you play as, I'm sure there has been those games where you'd get consistently hit by indirect fire, more so late game.
We all here can agree that indirect fire will make you bleed manpower, we also can agree that indirect fire can wipe squads, not as much as they used to now but they still may.
If you think that the ISG is insane then you really must be new or refuse to play any other faction due to bias reasons.
I mostly played 4v4 OKW for the longest of time because i found it to be the most fun faction to play as at that time. but i still do play all the other factions as well.
Before i get off topic if i hadn't already I believe the ISG is fine and more fair then half the other indirects out there. I'm sorry if my opinion is wrong or you are to stubborn to believe such a thing however i find it in a good spot now... finally...
Yeah facing dual ISGs is insanely frustrating playing as the Brits. Sniping models/squads everywhere you go, with the occassional (but crippling) wipe.
- I usually get one or two raketons when seeing a universal carrier, they usually shut down the wasp or the vickers upgrade easy. adding a shrek on your squads would have helped a lot as well.
- seeing as how you went mech, the flacktrack would have been a fun option, seeing as how british have a hard time dealing with them then the puma
not saying puma was a bad thing since that was very nice puma play
-his blob always went to protect his fuel so it'd probably be a good idea to switch the puma and the P2
-as for the crocodile I have no clue how to deal with that myself. panther instead of a P4 would have been more helpful
don't feel to bad as fire is ridiculous right now for both parties.