Molotov should be using fuel not munitions
29 Aug 2013, 10:23 AM
#1
Posts: 41
It has just occurred to me that according to molotov cocktail description it is a bottle full of petrol. So it is only realistic that it should cost a number of _fuel_ to throw instead of munitions, right?
29 Aug 2013, 10:27 AM
#2
1 
Posts: 300
Same goes for upgrading flamethrowers.
29 Aug 2013, 10:27 AM
#3
Posts: 252
So the soviets can have even more munition floating no?
It did used fuel but after all t-34 did beat panzer4 btw , this is game and it has gamelike mechanics , not simulation so :/
It did used fuel but after all t-34 did beat panzer4 btw , this is game and it has gamelike mechanics , not simulation so :/
Alehandro, Ale Ale-handro
29 Aug 2013, 10:29 AM
#4
Posts: 41
So the soviets can have even more munition floating no?
It did used fuel but after all t-34 did beat panzer4 btw , this is game and it has gamelike mechanics , not simulation so :/
Sure it is, i personally wouldn't have mind it to use manpower to throw as long as it is serving balance purposes. It's just that CoH2 did a lot of things for realism sake, like calling units off map instead of out of their buildings, so..
29 Aug 2013, 10:58 AM
#5
4 
Posts: 369
Well if you want that kind of realism then you should also be using munitions every time your soldiers shoot, and lose fuel when you're tank is driving 
29 Aug 2013, 11:04 AM
#6
Posts: 41
Well if you want that kind of realism then you should also be using munitions every time your soldiers shoot, and lose fuel when you're tank is driving
Right, like i said, i don't mind
I am just making fun of the game's sudden inconsistent approaches to "realism".
29 Aug 2013, 11:11 AM
#7
Posts: 627
It's an RTS. It's not intended to be realistic. All the "realistic" things that are done are done because they're seen as beneficial gameplay elements. Things like off map units, blizzards, vehicle recapture are only in because the devs see it as an addition to the gameplay.
Realism for realism's sake is always a moronic argument.
Realism for realism's sake is always a moronic argument.
29 Aug 2013, 12:36 PM
#8
Posts: 172
It's coh, in coh we use 'munitions' and 'fuel' which are resources, not necessarily straight representations of their real life counterparts.
Just like 'manpower', an number constantly rising up that can be used for various cohlike things.
Just like 'manpower', an number constantly rising up that can be used for various cohlike things.
29 Aug 2013, 13:03 PM
#9
Posts: 862
Well if you want that kind of realism then you should also be using munitions every time your soldiers shoot, and lose fuel when you're tank is driving
I do think there is the kernel for a new game in this idea. Give units a loadout of fuel and munitions and they have to either retreat to resupply or have it brought up to them at the front.
29 Aug 2013, 13:54 PM
#10
Posts: 2425
Permanently Banned Fun idea.
Might work if Paradox ever makes a WWII simulation ala CK and EU series.
Might work if Paradox ever makes a WWII simulation ala CK and EU series.
29 Aug 2013, 16:13 PM
#11
Posts: 336
It has just occurred to me that according to molotov cocktail description it is a bottle full of petrol. So it is only realistic that it should cost a number of _fuel_ to throw instead of munitions, right?
Teching, buildings and units cost fuel, whereas abilities cost munitions. Why would you want to complicate this by mixing it up for the sake of realism?
If you do want to add another resource I would go for something immaterial like "moral". If the "moral" of your troops is quite low you need to retreat them before they run off the field.
There Used To Be Great Nullist Quotes Here.
29 Aug 2013, 19:22 PM
#12
Posts: 170
Fun idea.
Might work if Paradox ever makes a WWII simulation ala CK and EU series.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearts_of_Iron_III
29 Aug 2013, 19:33 PM
#13
Posts: 1164
It has just occurred to me that according to molotov cocktail description it is a bottle full of petrol. So it is only realistic that it should cost a number of _fuel_ to throw instead of munitions, right?
but the molotov is a WEAPON... and WEAPONS need AMMUNITION... so, the petrol in the molotov is, for all intents and purposes, ammo :-)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
75 | ||
 |
|
|
65 | ||
|
|
|
|
46 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
47 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.968562.633+23
- 2.555227.710+11
- 3.29446.865-1
- 4.276110.715+14
- 5.259143.644+3
- 6.250150.625+11
- 7.22491.711+11
- 8.6512.844+3
- 9.250135.649+1
- 10.19265.747+5
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
7
Download
754
Board Info
588 users are online:
1 member and 587 guests
NorthWeapon
NorthWeapon
2 posts in the last 24h
36 posts in the last week
136 posts in the last month
36 posts in the last week
136 posts in the last month
Registered members: 45066
Welcome our newest member, Fid McSauce
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Fid McSauce
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM