hi,
there is a slight bug in the playercards:
https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561197984330863
as you can see, he has one win and 14 losses with soviets, but a winrate of 0.67, but actually it should be 0.067
slight bug in playercards
29 Aug 2016, 14:47 PM
#1
1 
Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
“Ha! They're scratching your paint job, Helmut!”
29 Aug 2016, 14:54 PM
#2
5 
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Wow great find. THOSE DAMN LEADING ZEROES.
Maybe Janne or Seb can sniff this one out.
Maybe Janne or Seb can sniff this one out.
29 Aug 2016, 15:44 PM
#3
Posts: 86
It should also be said that the "%" column is incorrect.
The numbers should be multiplied by 100 to be a percentage.
Currently it's a ratio.
The numbers should be multiplied by 100 to be a percentage.
Currently it's a ratio.
29 Aug 2016, 15:56 PM
#4
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Well that was a design choice. We use .000-1.000 so that they look like batting averages like in MLB professional baseball. I'm a baseball fan 
It would be more clear if it said ".AVG" instead of "%" in the header, but we never bothered with that.
It would be more clear if it said ".AVG" instead of "%" in the header, but we never bothered with that.
29 Aug 2016, 16:47 PM
#5
Posts: 86
Interesting, I am not familiar with baseball unfortunately.
I hesitated to make that remark because it seemed like it was like this for a reason.
I hesitated to make that remark because it seemed like it was like this for a reason.
29 Aug 2016, 19:06 PM
#6
Posts: 3709 | Subs: 2
That should be fixed now, coded it much better.
Let me know if you spot any other wrong result.
I also renamed the column to Ratio. Should it be an even more explicit Win-Rate instead?
Let me know if you spot any other wrong result.
I also renamed the column to Ratio. Should it be an even more explicit Win-Rate instead?
29 Aug 2016, 19:29 PM
#7
1 Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1
That should be fixed now
can confirm that
Let me know if you spot any other wrong result.
i doubt it, that just happened by accident. This guy drophacked against us which explains the difference between his 1v1 and 4v4 ratios
I also renamed the column to Ratio. Should it be an even more explicit Win-Rate instead?
if its not too broad and doesnt look stupid, i would do that.
“Ha! They're scratching your paint job, Helmut!”
29 Aug 2016, 19:38 PM
#8
5 Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Wow Seb, nice! 
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
57 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.46467.874+6
- 2.794136.854-1
- 3.867297.745+3
- 4.14465.689-1
- 5.401212.654+3
- 6.21156.790-2
- 7.300128.701+2
- 8.353186.655+2
- 9.501325.607+4
- 10.327118.735-1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
15
Download
2713
Board Info
858 users are online:
858 guests
0 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
21 posts in the last month
3 posts in the last week
21 posts in the last month
Registered members: 62094
Welcome our newest member, Womekaxi
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM
Welcome our newest member, Womekaxi
Most online: 4501 users on 26 Oct 2025, 01:00 AM