Posts: 323
You're kidding, right ? QF17 is shit. It misses like 50% of its shots, dies to a single incendiary grenade and costs 20 pop and 70 fuel. I'll take Pak 43 over this crap any day.
Posts: 1653
Posts: 323
I've seen it missing lots of times
Posts: 1653
Posts: 262
Posts: 515
Can someone check the accuracy of both these AT emplacements?
Posts: 503
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
If Relic wanted to change that, then they should move its range back to at least 90. Then like in real life, you would have to scout your enemies position and take out the Pak before marching forward (think infantry take down of 88 batteries on Normandy in BoB so they could bring their armor forward). That would add a fun element instead of super easy to de-crew, fires through obstacles BS we have now.
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
The 17Pdr I think also suffers from the inaccuracy effects of using particles and tracers instead of the projectile system.I can confirm this. Just looked through the attribute editor and it lacks a projectile.
Posts: 954
I can confirm this. Just looked through the attribute editor and it lacks a projectile.
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
Posts: 118
Strange, because everytime i've seen one in action, it doesn't miss the target, we don't see the projectile but the health on tanks goes down
 | Playercard of Juggernauth | |||||||||||||||
|
 |
|
|
95 | ||
 |
|
|
88 | ||
 |
|
|
44 | ||
 |
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
102 | ||
 |
|
|
27 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
