Firstly. It's NaOCl.
Secondly, I didn't make an argument, I ASKED A QUESTION, perhaps going to school might have helped you understand the difference. I'll repeat for the ones among us who didn't ever manage to learn comprehension.
"Why is their veterancy so bad?"
I wanted to understand the REASONING and DESIGN PHILOSOPHY behind why they don't scale well into the late game.
IE is it to stop double sturmpionier being a viable opening? Some other reason?
Firstly, I dont care about spelling your name correctly ncal.
Secondly, you are right. You did not make an argument, but you carried an argument with Blancat over from another thread. This time, the word "argument" refers to the act of arguing.
argument
/ˈɑːɡjʊm(ə)nt/Submit
noun
noun: argument; plural noun: arguments
1.
an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.
"I've had an argument with my father"
2.
a reason or set of reasons given in support of an idea, action or theory.
"there is a strong argument for submitting a formal appeal"
You can argue about your argument (Your Point) through engaging in an argument or the act of arguing. A real clunky sentence but hey ))))))) - I thought school was supposed to teach you words can have multiple meanings, I guess your school must have failed you
----
Why is their veterency bad? Because they are an engineer unit.
For 300 MP you get a unit that is able to sweep, lay mines, build things, and have a use early on. With the sweeper they also get a repair bonus I think to reflect their higher MP cost relative to other engineer-type units.
The fact that they get shrecks also meant they want to keep the veterency power reasonable to prevent a blob of high vet sturms stomping everything. They aren't really meant to form the core of your force. You got Volksgren for that.