Stormtrooper g43
![avatar of DerKuhlmann](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 469
Also they lose tactical assault when upgrading g43.
So
4 g43s and tactical assault please.
![avatar of CombCrab](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 50
![avatar of Unit G17](/uploads/avatar/32595.jpg?updated=1547306607)
Posts: 498
![avatar of WAAAGH2000](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 730
![avatar of Sander93](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
![avatar of SkysTheLimit](/images/avatars/rear_echelons.png?updated=1440837436)
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Not saying its not possible, but I think it only on those types of weapons because they are cqc. Would be too strong on g43s which are completely different
![avatar of Vipper](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 13477 | Subs: 1
Tactical assault/advance has also restricted to automatic weapons if im not mistaken. I think its only been on squads with mp40s, thompsons, stgs, etc.
Not saying its not possible, but I think it only on those types of weapons because they are cqc. Would be too strong on g43s which are completely different
Thompson is hardly CQC weapon. It is effective even at range 20.
The ability was also available to ST44...
(I would rather see this ability redesigned for all unit.)
![avatar of LoopDloop](/images/avatars/m20.png?updated=1414778115)
Posts: 3053
Tactical assault/advance has also restricted to automatic weapons if im not mistaken. I think its only been on squads with mp40s, thompsons, stgs, etc.
Not saying its not possible, but I think it only on those types of weapons because they are cqc. Would be too strong on g43s which are completely different
Yes. With g43s it'd be a no-brainer to just use when you're in cover all the time because your additional DPS gained is a lot more than the extra damage your squad will take. It's a lot riskier to use with smgs since you have to be so close for it to be effective, which also makes it less potentially powerful than on an all ranges weapon like the g43.
![avatar of SkysTheLimit](/images/avatars/rear_echelons.png?updated=1440837436)
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Thompson is hardly CQC weapon. It is effective even at range 20.
The ability was also available to ST44...
I literally listed STGs in the post you quoted. You quote me JUST to correct my word choice and you didnt even read all the words
Stgs, thompsons, mp40s are "MUCH MORE CQC oriented" than g43s. Higher dps at close range, lower dps at max and thats the problem. Stormtrooper g43s have good long range dps, so you could use it at long range without worrying about the RA penalty
Yes. With g43s it'd be a no-brainer to just use when you're in cover all the time because your additional DPS gained is a lot more than the extra damage your squad will take. It's a lot riskier to use with smgs since you have to be so close for it to be effective, which also makes it less potentially powerful than on an all ranges weapon like the g43.
Very much agreed. If g43s need a new ability they should make a new one. Doesnt make much sense for an ability made for full-autos to be applied to a semi-auto
![avatar of blancat](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 810
How about giving them a g43 of JLI?
![avatar of Farlon](/images/avatars/sniper_german.png?updated=1394378846)
Posts: 184
How about giving them a g43 of JLI?
How about no
![avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned![avatar of IncendiaryRounds:)](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned3x G43s is already very strong for a unit that can hide behind enemy lines and chase down wounded (retreating) squads. Don't forget that G43s keep ~90-99% DPS while moving. 4 of them would make them too powerful without also adjusting the stats (but then what would be the point of G43s).
I heard somewhere G43's moving acc is 75% not 90+. 75 is already very good but there's no way it would be 90+
![avatar of Vipper](/images/no_av.png)
Posts: 13477 | Subs: 1
I heard somewhere G43's moving acc is 75% not 90+. 75 is already very good but there's no way it would be 90+
Depends on range:
Range 0
11.6/13.2 = 87%
Range 35
3.1/3.2 = 97%
One has to keep in mind thou that K-98 is alloy worse on the move while it contributes allot more at rang 35.
![avatar of Balanced_Gamer](/images/avatars/jagdpanzeriv.png?updated=1414778106)
Posts: 783
![avatar of Jae For Jett](/uploads/avatar/22287.png?updated=1539321595)
![Senior Strategist Badge](/images/badges/badge_SENIOR_STRATEGIST.png)
Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2
I heard somewhere G43's moving acc is 75% not 90+. 75 is already very good but there's no way it would be 90+
G43 moving accuracy is 80%, so basically yes. However, what you're missing is that they also have a 50% moving cooldown multiplier, the end result being (like sander and vipper said) that their moving DPS is from around 87-97% of their stationary DPS.
![avatar of JibberJabberJobber](/uploads/avatar/15177.png?updated=1580357160)
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
- Give pgrens 4 G43's from 3.
- Lower the moving dps of pgren G43's to something like 75-85 instead of 87-97.
That way my pgrens atleast have a more clear role distinction if I decide to degrade them for 25 munitions.
![:snfCHVGame: :snfCHVGame:](/images/Smileys/computerheatvgame.png)
![down](/images/buttons/down_arrow.png)
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
13 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
116 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
36 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
5 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
3 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.279110.717+17
- 2.270144.652+2
- 3.558230.708+2
- 4.422.955+12
- 5.29647.863+2
- 6.8120.802-1
- 7.19078.709+4
- 8.20387.700-1
- 9.399200.666+8
- 10.212115.648+17
Replay highlight
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger
![Einhoven Country](/images/maps/4p_enhoven_country.jpg)
![Honor](/images/buttons/HONOR_icon.png)
![Download](/images/buttons/DOWNLOAD_icon.png)
Board Info
20 posts in the last week
137 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Wehling
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM