Profile of Australian Magic

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198105012992


Thread: P47 strike2 Aug 2015, 09:15 AM Ok, I made few tests and I did not see any issues you are saying. I launched P47 onto KT and drive with it just next to red circle. Results? P47s (after first wave when they attacked KT) were circling just next to KT which was out of the red circle by a hair. No matter how many times I try, P47s always stop to attack when out of red circle (unless they target you for second wave before you ge of from the circle) In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: P47 strike1 Aug 2015, 23:56 PM If you keep even Panzer 4 in the middle of P47s so they can target you all the time, there is a chance that Pz4 will survive (rockets often hit next to vehicle). It's worse than Stuka. And if you have problems with P47, while you have tons of fuel (KT and ST) you can easily pick 251/17 and keep it behind lines so it can snipe planes. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: USF vs OKW1 Aug 2015, 23:45 PM USF blob power. Pure 1919 blob with defensive stance is unstoppable... unless you did not hear Stuka zu fuss coming And that PackHowie In: Replays
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate1 Aug 2015, 16:46 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2015, 15:41 PMAlexzandvar The KT is an a-move machine if your fighting a bad enemy. But if your fighting in a competitive game then the KT is best for just sitting on a point and never moving. It's horrible speed combined with it's poor turret rotation makes it very poor for supporting large attacks (because it simply can't keep up or escape). Just spending the fuel on a more diverse force is a better idea. The KT is normally only a good idea in desperate situations were you have lost your trucks in a big push and can't afford to wait to make them and then build up an army. It has the same armor as an IS2 while having half the speed and acceleration and only 1 more shot's worth of health. Sure you can argue that the gun is better but do you really need to spend 260 fuel on a gun when you can achieve more with a more mobile force of lighter vehicles? Its not like You can send it to enemy's base and win. Its mobile battle station, very hard to kill when supported. And Itp definetly worth price. Saved my ass many times when Jp4s and stuka could not handle. And it does not need to fight against stun shot like IS which is op in current form. Is2 for me is nowhere as scary as kt. In: Lobby
Thread: How to deal with blobs1 Aug 2015, 13:56 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2015, 13:51 PMLatch There is only 1 way for Relic to completely remove blobbing for the game and they have yet to listen to me. Have each squad check for another squad within a certain radius, if the amount of squads in said radius is > whatisdeterminedasablob, reduce ROF for each squad and increase damage taken. No one would blob again. or.... give all factions non-doc demo Currently when you blob Grens/Volks you must consider demos, when you make BARs blob you don't need to. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ML-20 152mm Howitzer1 Aug 2015, 13:01 PM Yoy know LeFH can do same thing? Howitzers are finally useful, which is OK. Sov and USF have counter against leFH; Ost has counter agasint ML-20, B4. Only OKW lacks something. Best option is to strike with stuka (unrepaired will be destroyed with second strike). So it's not about nefring howies but it's about givig OKW something to deal with. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate1 Aug 2015, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2015, 11:49 AMGluhoman Pershing will be locked too, you need to t1 or t2, t3 and special upgrade and then you can call pershing, I think it is fair. Why do you think that in Pershing doc will be no upgrades for rifles or p47? And how do you know that? Ok, imagine there is no King Tiger but Panther in OKW HQ, and you need to set all trucks to get it. Would you think it's fair that you must get all trucks to unlock Panther? Panther is not iWin unit (KT isnt as well, but it can be sometimes) and Pershing would not be either. King Tiger is step higher than IS2 and Tiger, while they should be a bit higher than Pershing. Because Pershing+P47+1919 might be OP? In: Lobby
Thread: M26 Pershing/Calliope Debate1 Aug 2015, 11:36 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2015, 11:06 AMGluhoman Yeah, it's great idea. If Pershing will be in doc, everyone will be picking it, forgetting others docs. I think special upgrade for t0 to call in Pershing will be nice. After you tech major of course. It's not best solution. KT is locked behind all techs cause it's A-move machine. High damage, high armor, great agasint armor and infantry. Pershing woulnd not be like this. It would be slower Panther or something like Tiger with worse AI power. Picking it and not using other docs? Really? No upgrades for Rifles, no P47 etc etc etc. If everyone would pick Pershing, it would very easy to counter since you know what enemy will do. In: Lobby
Thread: OKW P41 Aug 2015, 10:57 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2015, 10:49 AMAlexzandvar With 3 bulletins the OKW PIV has 270 frontal armor In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: UKF - Know your units - .Emplacements1 Aug 2015, 10:17 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2015, 00:52 AMMr. Someguy The key difference is that the Pak 43 can be decrewed easily by anything that can kill a Pak 40 Crew, while the 17 Pounder can only be decrewed in the same way a vehicle is. And I'm not sure if it is advantage or not. I mean, sure, it's easy to decrew Pak43 but you can re-crew it and repair. So once you lose Pak43 (crew) you don't need to spend another 500 to make second. For example, enemy will mortar 17punder till death, while Pak43 only till crew is gone and then switch target - in meantime you can repair it and re-crew. But it's hard right now. We'll see how it wil work. In: Lobby