Profile of Katitof

It’s the mp, not the fuel. Fuel is easy to determine if you’re ahead or not, while mp is different. Just take a look at my last replay uploaded and you’ll see what I mean. Opponent went 6 cons and had the mp savings from 7man cons to roll out support weapons and tanks despite equal kills.

At any rate, all I said was make 7 man cons a bit less mp efficient, which is a sentiment a lot of people share. Not sure why I’m being singled out here.

Soviets don't have higher mp then any other faction.
7 man cons are designed to win attrition war in small arms combat, but by that time you should have indirect fire support raining on them as well.

You are overestimating 7 man con attrition and simply not killing enough yourself if you think its possible to save over 1k mp over OKW with their dps of vetted obers or falls supported by stuka or ISG.

They like stroking eggrolls, no doubt. First they destroy strategy gaming with their terrible DLC policy towards developers, along side terrible top down management *DOW3*. Then they just jump ship and move to China. I hope they rot there.

Blizzard/Activision can do the same. They don't give a damn about people, much less consumers. I uninstalled battle.net after the debacle with Hong Kong and I urge all of you out there to do the same.

Better watch what you wish for, let me remind you that outside of Relic, there is literally ZERO viable and interesting RTS games out there with deep mechanics.

SC2 is the same game it was in 1996, just with more units and better graphics, mechanically its exactly the same.

AoE? Please, its one big nostalgia party.

I wouldn't count on Iron Harvest as anything better then flavor of the month as from what I have seen so far, devs do justice to visuals, but are blindfolded in the dark room about mechanics and counters dynamics.

Ancestors Legacy? As fun as it was, no competitive matchmaking makes it dead game.
Spellforce 3 Soul Harvest, as great as it is, its too niche game to get any serious traction.
Northgard is very fun, but it requires a LOT of time and I mean A LOT, rush strats are 40 minute ones.
The Settlers might be interesting, but again, its going to be a niche one too.

Everything else isn't even worth mentioning.

So as big as DoW3 flop was, if not for Relic, there really isn't anything we can count on in RTS world.
Blizzard is too busy sucking its own dick and reheating that old pork chop we liked 20 years ago, anyone else from AAA bunch is terrified of even thinking of RTS genre and indie ones never seem to pick up even if they are good looking visually and mechanically, for whatever reason indie RTS developers firmly seem to believe competitive matchmaking or even any kind of matchmaking isn't even worth considering.

Great work, but it scares me to imagine that gaming will become part of a political agenda

It already did.
One of the football players spoke out against CCP and chinese had him removed from latest Fifa, because EA will suck any kind of cock to get even a single penny more if it could.

Same for activision blizzard, but I suppose that story is known enough to not repeat it again here.

Gaming goes political, because most big companies grew too big and too greedy, willing to do anything it takes and betray whatever values they need to just to get some chinese money.

Lol noob, go complain about new maps, like pros.

Yes it does, if you put it at T3 the call in is pointless. Putting it at T4 means that the call in group allows you to obtain a T4 unit for a 50mp cheaper price, or you can just wait for 50ish fuel and get the squad from T4.

The call-in is pointless since tech rework anyway.