Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Soviet T1 redesign/rebranding30 Mar 2020, 22:29 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 22:19 PMcochosgo If it come to it, I think penals would be a cool close quarters assault unit, something the soviet basic rooster lacks alltogheter And they shouldn't, given the fact how many doctrinal CQC options of all flavors exist. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Medium TDs will need more accuracy30 Mar 2020, 21:06 PM ATGs are being decrewed so oft, I don't think their vet is much of a concern on the long run. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?30 Mar 2020, 19:33 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 18:50 PMelchino7 If i were the original poster and a troll i would be delighted how a small post and a poll has completely triggered people into a 10 page thread. Also 69 (noice) votes for a total of 82% of people against doing anything on them. If we want to be precise, original topic was exhausted and dead by first half of 3rd page. Then someone derailed it on the other side of balance spectrum and that was real troll. So, so far we have 7 pages that don't even address original post. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are we still playing Coh2 in 2vs2 or Company of Tigers?30 Mar 2020, 19:29 PM Removing range vet from heavies and possibly bringing back range of tiger to 40 would also help keeping heavies strong, but not roflstompy if cost isn't going to go up any further. Shitload of possible BOs and doctrines are shut down by default by overpowering presence of opposing heavy or appeal of own one. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?30 Mar 2020, 16:29 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 16:25 PMachpawel Or maybe You should just accept different points of view? I don't feel like derailing it. More like putting some sense into it, and drawing attention to a simple fact that CEs are in a faction that is on top at the moment, and ideas such as let's buff Soviet engies are just sheer nonsense. You are a naked man on the streets, screaming the sky is falling and are greatly surprised why no one else agrees with you. I accept your opinion. I simply believe you're wrong, since your arguments are running in circle and you have not shown evidence of your, quite outrageous, claim. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are we still playing Coh2 in 2vs2 or Company of Tigers?30 Mar 2020, 16:22 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 12:20 PMHannibal I do not like the current heavy-only meta, but I am against the idea that mediums should be a reliable counter to heavies, because this is one of the main purposes of heavies: not needing to care about mediums anymore if they show their frontal armor. Currently, mediums have about a 70-80% pen chance at max range if they hit the rear armor, which goes up by a couple percent if you go to range 20. 2 meds shouldn't frontally counter heavy, but 1 heavy shouldn't be cheaper then 2 meds if its to counter them without much of an issue. To me the biggest problem with heavies is not how effective they are themselves, but how cost effective they are compared to alternative, which is multiple meds. While heavies are quite vulnerable from behind, unless heavy overextends, you aren't going to get a lot of opportunities to exploit that weakness. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?30 Mar 2020, 16:17 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 16:14 PMachpawel Just remember that the post started with the idea that CEs are too weak and should be buffed!!! And you completely derailed it to the other side of the spectrum and just won't let go, despite LITERALLY EVERY SINGLE PERSON, including a very well known axis fanboi who spans dozens of posts in every thread that can nerf an allied unit have told BOTH of you that they are fine. OP has already let it go, you should follow his example. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?30 Mar 2020, 13:17 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 13:14 PMporkloin But Spios are better than engies right? Like you totally would have won if you did build them right? And how often do you play against engi spam of other factions again? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?30 Mar 2020, 13:08 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 13:00 PMporkloin Either of you care to provide replays demonstrating why these workers are stronger than CE? Scaling and upgrades alone makes it quite obvious. Utility and abilites further prove the point. CEs are the cheapest, because they provide the least in terms of both. They don't have actual combat scaling like sappers, sturmpios and RETs. They don't have stock or doctrinal upgrades or vet increasing their durability significantly, like sappers, strumpios, pios and RETs. They don't have direct combat support, like sturmpios nades, sappers AT nades, RETs suppression volley or pio sights. They even can't place fortifications other then wire, unlike all of the above. CEs are good where they are at their price and performance point. And the sole fact that you need to have this pointed out to you means you're beyond recovery. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should soviet Combat E ngineers be buffed?30 Mar 2020, 12:53 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2020, 12:53 PMporkloin For the naysayers: which worker unit is the strongest right now? That would be sturmpios.... In: COH2 Balance