Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion30 Nov 2020, 09:38 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2020, 09:37 AMaddvaluejack If Elefant has comparable mobility to M36, I won't mind it only has 60 range. You don't need that to bully SU-85 or FF. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion30 Nov 2020, 09:24 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2020, 09:21 AMaddvaluejack Elefant is designed to counter Allies' TDs (SU85, M36, Firefly). How could it fulfil this role if it has same range as Allies' TDs? The exact same way a Panther counters M10. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion30 Nov 2020, 08:03 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Nov 2020, 05:43 AMT.R. Stormjäger I find it weird that the ISU is getting (extremely rightfully) nerfed, yet the overpowered Elefant which trashes Allies in teamgames is allowed to be overpowered. That thing was a meme irl and couldn’t climb a light slope. Reduce its mobility hard. +1. I'm also of opinion that if ISU HE shell is losing range, ALL the other AT shells should follow the suit. These vehicles are nothing but problems from day 1 and the origin is always the same - unreasonably high frontal durability, range and guaranteed penetration on everything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback29 Nov 2020, 21:42 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 21:35 PMmiragefla The problem with the Penal PTRS, however, and why it could maybe have 3 is that the Penal PTRS squad doesn't scale really well into late-game. It's not incredibly dangerous to armour, it's snare while potent - is short-range and you're giving up an 8 population 300 manpower tier-locked squad to light anti-vehicle work that falters against infantry the moment it takes losses and the unit often doesn't have enough time to sustain DPS before getting butchered. I can see the need for increasing rate of fire, but at the end of the day, it's essentially a dedicated AV squad so it does need to threaten vehicles later in the game. New T3/T4 upgrade, "PTRS training", PTRS does what PTRS does for guards in soviet campaign. Tho, it would really be amazing if penals weren't complete meme in late game, both AI and AT option. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion29 Nov 2020, 19:20 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 19:16 PMLetzte Bataillon The ISU-152 can do the same but destroy infantry as well. It's the anti-infantry ammo that has slightly reduced range with the preview patch. Except, AT performance of ISU is on the level of SU-76. Supplemental at very best. JT and Ele will shred effortelessly all and every armored unit allies have, ISU will bounce off of OKW P4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback29 Nov 2020, 16:48 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 16:46 PMVipper Point here is that Vicker K is not the only issue but the armor also. Combined with target size Ro.E. entity get nearly 170 effective HP. And? You're getting it at stage where tanks and indirect fire is all over the place, negating it all. Stop acting like heavy sappers upgrade comes before AEC. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback29 Nov 2020, 16:02 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:59 PMVipper Think it would be a better idea to make the two mortars different weapons. That could help so that the 2 mortar do not fire simultaneously. Why? Its pointless and serves no function. Nothing prevents getting dual mortar with any other faction and shooting them at the same time nor does it cause any kind of issue. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:24 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:17 PMSander93 We're thinking about giving Penals 3x PTRS or reducing aim time, and letting PTRS attack ground. Wouldn't the attack ground require giving PTRS actual ballistic projectile? And 3 PTRS, while it certainly would help stock penals AT, tank hunter cons would be left in dust as if doctrine wasn't dead already. Perhaps an ability that would inflict temporary blind or engine crit? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:16 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:11 PMVipper You claim is factual wrong. Allied TDs are far more accurate the Panther to begin with and get 3x times the bonus Panther gets. Which is perfectly balanced by axis having a dedicated TDs against meds that do not have any accuracy issues and panther being much more durable and mobile then any allied TD. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] SOV Feedback29 Nov 2020, 15:15 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Nov 2020, 15:07 PMVipper PTRS vs light could be improved by reducing time before firing. If that is fixed they should their AI moved to an ability. For instance their accuracy could be lower and hit the dirt provide accuracy buffs to PTRS. Or you can just buff them, because non guards don't do anything to infantry and guards don't do 40 dmg to infantry anymore for years. In: COH2 Balance