Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Which faction do you prefer?1 Mar 2014, 18:56 PM Why there is no option for both/none? Can't vote because of that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sniper Balance1 Mar 2014, 18:09 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2014, 00:47 AMTristan44 He has the most important function, keeping the sniper team alive lol.. Ah and btw I would love to see a player post a replay of them beating sniper+scout cars on langre. Of course ideally it would be nice to have a soviet player who had some skill and wasn't a complete noob.. I have gone from stagnant soviet play hovering around ELO 50s-60s to destroying everyone (top 10 players included) and being in 30s... In just a few games... It doesn't even have to be guards with snipers because I just get at nades. Always works... I almost feel cheap doing it. Well, some strats are map dependent and lang being not in coh2 design spirit as its a port asked for imbalances since day one. It is a fun map, but its not balanced, nor coh2 suitable. Heavy mortar, M3 sniper, PaK43, elephant(or any 100 range vehicle), bunkers, all of that is batshit OP on that map, so I wouldn't use it as justification example. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ram 1 Mar 2014, 18:05 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2014, 17:44 PMJaigen Use the su85's then. oh wait you cannot use them because you have no concept of combined arms scouting or strat. you have not given me a good reason on the other hand why a panther should lose to t-34 + some AT. it goes against the very principality of combined arms of coh when you can just spam 2 units and easily win. Great idea! If only soviets had SU-85 in T3 or german players were retarded enough to sit before AT gun for 20 seconds until it kills their tiger/panther, well, maybe thats how you play and think this is sufficient way? That would explain a whole lot of things coming from your madman's mumbling. dude, you're as mad as it can get, you most likely have 0 games as soviets, you're retarded enough to suggest getting T%3 AND T4 as soviets, why do you expect anyone to take your rants seriously? I answer to them only because I love arguments, but even that have its limits and it feels like it would be easier to talk sense into wiking then you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ram 1 Mar 2014, 14:48 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2014, 14:43 PMJaigen awesome arguments Beats yours "remove ram because T3 should be vet factory for panzers" by miles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviets Advanced Warfare Tactics Commander1 Mar 2014, 14:19 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2014, 12:41 PMPorygon Saying radio is fine is like saying maphack is fine Saying radio intercept is a map hack is like saying SU-76 is a tank hunter. You want to see maphack? Try interrogation. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviets Advanced Warfare Tactics Commander1 Mar 2014, 10:34 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2014, 07:50 AMLe Wish Since few are using it anyway, exchanging some of the abilities couldn't hurt. Put guards instead, in all of them and there! NKVD have something appealiong suddenly(guards+prop arty), AA have early game presence and guards match advanced warfare anyway and german whiners don't have to deal with "op information about what they have built" everyone happy! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ram 28 Feb 2014, 22:39 PM If germans had ram it would never be used, because it would be rained by AT nades before it would get halfway to the target. Is it so hard to do the same as germans? And saying T3 should have no at? How biased can you be? Maybe to balance that, german T3 also should have short barreled P4 and StuG? Are you up for that? Then it would be balanced! You would have 3 AI vehicles in T3 for both factions and 1 AT in T4, perfectly balanced game and no ram if you ask me! All you need to do is say how much you love this idea, because its perfect for you. You need AT? You have T2 and T4 for it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ram 28 Feb 2014, 22:11 PM Because: 1)Relic never removed an ability from the game and somehow I doubt it will change and for the 2nd part, because 34/85 is a completely different tank, its not upgunned sherman where only cannon was different. Upgrading 34/76 to 34/85 makes as much sense as upgrading 34/76 to KV-1. And 2)Thats probably mechanically impossible. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spam > Strategy (KV2, Artillery, etc)28 Feb 2014, 21:49 PM Can we get this "soviet unit killed my ubermensh" thread locked already? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ram 28 Feb 2014, 21:20 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2014, 20:47 PMKronosaur0s I dont have any problems when Ram disables german medium tanks like the ostwind, stug, panther, panzer 4 or brummbar. But disabling a heavy and expensive vehicle like the Tiger or Elefant, to me, thats just silly and shouldnt exist. That is exactly why ramming have a penetration that is much lower then heavy tank armor. Even vet1 tiger have 0 problems escaping ram and it isn't particularly hard to not overextend tiger until vet1. Elephant is batshit OP since its only weakness, infantry AT, doesn't exist on soviet side and even shooting at its rear T34 have 50% to penetrate, if that doesn't account for OP, then TA was perfectly balance as well. In: COH2 Balance