Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Emplacements15 Dec 2020, 09:15 AM And on what basis you want to nerf them? Not a single one is any problem anymore, unless you just ignore and never deploy counters. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Osttruppen Discussion and Feedback14 Dec 2020, 20:46 PM I feel like they would underperform if they had increased cost. T1 requirement is all they would need in light of other changes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion14 Dec 2020, 20:34 PM Probably, but "vipper doesn't like how it is now" isn't exactly a valid reason to even start considering the option and literally no one ever complained about their default weapons being too strong or weak. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion14 Dec 2020, 20:28 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2020, 20:22 PMVipper Because the the Carbine is designed for mid to close and they should have a weapon designed for mid to far. Alright. Give them M1919 then as that's the only non sniper crit long range weapon USF has. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] OST Feedback14 Dec 2020, 20:07 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2020, 15:14 PMWolfsgeist Reading the patchnotes one thing struck me as odd: The increase in fuel to tech up to Battlephase 1 to delay/prevent light vehicle spam. It does not only delay the 222 and halftrack, but also Pgrens, Rifle Nades and AT-Guns. If the intention was to only delay the vehicles, then another approach would have been better. The intention is to delay all of T2. LVs and PGs were too opressive so early and you don't need ATG vs ultra lights. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] General Discussion14 Dec 2020, 20:05 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2020, 13:54 PMVipper They simply should not start with Paras Carbines... Why? Its 2 rifles on expensive squad that isn't known for durability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: It's time for Main Gun Crits to go14 Dec 2020, 08:39 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2020, 08:30 AMElpern So, dont... use your vehicles then? Or... don't put them in disadvantegous positions? You know, it might not be that obvious to everyone, but T34 in front of KT isn't going to end well and no amount of RNG luck on T34 will change it, while you can make a bet vs OKW P4. Really poor arguments if you'd call them that, because you are forcing the player to play around something that has super low chance of happening, while simultaneously it is a game changer IF it happens. You dont do that. The 1 shot difference or even two shot difference between a vehicle taking out another happens so often in this game that to then be thrown a crit in your face as such that it isnt a bounce/miss is insulting because you cant and shouldnt be thinking about it, the chance of happening is too small. But when, god forbid, the pumas main gun gets destroyed upon closing in on the 1 hp aec or vice versa aec gets abandoned its almost always a game changer, and ive not seen a single argument to defend this 'mechanic' Like betting on grens sniping a rifle before they get close? Like maxim suppressing something before it throws nuclear/lava nade? Like arty actually hitting what you were intended to hit with 1st shot? Game is absolutely FULL of these low odds events. You have some influence over most of them. And the ones you don't are/were already removed, like plane crash unit wipes. The remaining ones are the very reason why the game is still so fresh, engaging and interesting to play AND watch. Sorry, but these are not unfair. They may cost you the game, but you know the risk and if you commit anyway, its 100% on you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry, mortars and MGs: relationship and scaling. 14 Dec 2020, 08:00 AM Being best mortar is like winning special olympics. Yeah, 120mm might be "best", but its still retarded. Sadly, in current meta there is hardly any reason to go any other type of mortar then pit and counter response to it. Mortars were pretty much soft removed from the game under the guise of reducing rng wipes. The only one that sees some use is soviet one and exclusively because of its flare. Any other situation, you're almost always better with another MG. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: It's time for Main Gun Crits to go14 Dec 2020, 07:57 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2020, 07:34 AMVipper A Player controls criticals as much as he controls penetrating shots. So.... pretty high level of control. You can choose to engage or not to engage vehicles depending on their chance to pen vs your chance to be penned and evaluate your chances from there. Just as you can choose to keep engaging with low health vehicle or to retreat. Thank you for supporting crits with this actually decent for once argument. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback14 Dec 2020, 00:13 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2020, 00:08 AMKT610 Infantry section cover bonus should be moved to vet 1. This would slightly reduce their early game perform, but leave their late game performance unchanged. For the bazzilionth time, they DO NOT HAVE ANY COVER BONUS. THEY HAVE OUT OF COVER PENALTY. The DPS on the stat pages? That is the DPS they have IN cover. In: COH2 Balance