Profile of JHeartless

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1637

General Information
Steam: 76561198006521729


Thread: Thoughts on ISU-15217 Sep 2014, 22:44 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2014, 22:22 PMWewe And thats the point mark vehicle turns every tank into paper and as i said mines everywhere there is no flank against decent players. You will hit a mine eventually and thats it. I know. They totally should add a mine sweeper to the Panther. MVGame. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pathfinders17 Sep 2014, 21:01 PM I like the IR Pathfinders for the early barrage but not the regular pathfinders. The drop zone beacons are too easily spotted and destroyed and they cant reinforce the air dropped support weapons. As a combat unit they are not spectacular for their cost. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why were scripts nerfed again 2 patches ago?17 Sep 2014, 20:45 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2014, 20:35 PMIronFist Iirc Peter explains that in the 3 minute section I referenced. I watched it last Thursday so I don't want to misquote their reasoning. However I remember he does go into some depth about why the Cons were changed the way they were. Earlier he plays Soviets and wins I think to demonstrate the subsequent point. All PQ said there is their damage was buffed and their survivability nerfed to better suit their role. That doesn't really explain anything. Their role was core infantry with low cost, low damage, high survivability, moderate utility and no scalability. Well that WAS their role anyway. What is it supposed to be now? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on ISU-15217 Sep 2014, 19:59 PM +1 to Switching ammo types for balance but lets not make it as crippling as the Shermans otherwise it would be a HUGE nerf. Makes the most sense and its already in the game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why were scripts nerfed again 2 patches ago?17 Sep 2014, 19:47 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2014, 18:49 PMTensaiOni No, I mean any actual maths people might have done or games they might have played to be sure how the changes play out. And actually, even if you just read the patch notes, you should notice that it wasn't a nerf - a change at worst. Unless you cherry pick specific changes without context just to prove your point. It was a nerf to their surviability. A buff to their damage. And as I said before they struggle to survive as it is. So yes in the most technical term it was a change. But their damage is hardly anything to talk about even in its buffed state. Also their damage DOES NOT HELP THEM WHEN THEY ARE TRYING TO TOSS A MOLOTOV OR AT GRENADE lol. I could care less about the Balance of scripts vs Ost it was ok before until the LMG came in. I care about their ability to do anything but bleed to OKW. And that has gotten worse. Which to me is a nerf. I understand PQ envisions scripts fighting from Green cover all the time. And thats fine and dandy if they had excellent long range DPS and they could even fit behind their own sandbags. And if he wanted PPSH upgrades to also be long range. But in reality thats not whats going to happen in 9/10 cases. You do need to cap after all. To answer your questions directly Tensai have I used them since the patch? Yes in everyone of my Soviet games which has netted me my nifty 3 game losing streak. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why were scripts nerfed again 2 patches ago?17 Sep 2014, 16:07 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2014, 12:03 PMTensaiOni Too all those who say that conscripts were nerfed, is it just your gut feeling or do you have any data to support it? Since at least when compared to Grenadiers I'd personally would say, if anything, that they were buffed against them. Other then what the patch notes say? Sure against Grens and other moderate DPS units it may be buff. But Scripts already Melted to Falls and Ober fire. So now they Melt faster (smells like a Nerf to me). Soooo outside of some data analytics Relic may have on how much the Total Cost of Ownership of Conscripts were Pre Change and Post Change there is really no good data to provide. Its the inverse to what Snipers provide. With snipers you have a large upfront cost and upkeep but a low total cost relative to the bleed they inflict. Its a matter of economy. If it took you say 60 MP to kill an LMG gren model before on average and they gained a small buff (maybe someone like you or Milka can run the numbers) and now they take 66MP to get the same result then obviously their TCO went up (which was already high IMO). Of course this is all magnified relative to how much higher a squads DPS is pushed up. So say it is 66MP now to kill a single LMG gren Model at Vet 0 this will in turn GO UP as the Gren gets vet (that they will get faster due to the nerf) And that also doesnt account for Pintle MGs when they try to toss an AT nade. Or the relationship to optimum range of the PPSH. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Survivor - Episode II17 Sep 2014, 13:22 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2014, 13:05 PMvan Voort Well it doesn't have sexy tanks, and you lose the MG34 if you upgrade Obers Next round will be a bit of a knife fight I think MG34 is for NOOBS! Pros use Kubel cause it takes huge amounts of skill! MVGame. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Does anyone else have dreams about playing matches?17 Sep 2014, 01:51 AM You the only one.... In: Lobby
Thread: Commander Survivor - Episode II17 Sep 2014, 01:44 AM Spec Ops? People don't like that boss flare? Shocktroop spanking STG44? Sheesh people must not like the avatar... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why were scripts nerfed again 2 patches ago?16 Sep 2014, 22:13 PM Flame engineers are a better and more useful unit now. Unless they want to give demo charge and mines to scripts. Merging with the support units the soviets are meant to spam isn't even as cost effective as a normal reinforce. In: COH2 Balance