In March and April 1940, British plans for an invasion of Norway were prepared, mainly in order to reach and destroy the Swedish iron ore mines in Gällivare. It was hoped that this would divert German forces away from France, and open a war front in south Sweden.
Moving east, the Germans were surprised when the British started to abandon Narvik on 3 June. By that time the German offensive in France had progressed to such an extent that the British could no longer afford any commitment in Norway, and the 25,000 Allied troops were evacuated from Narvik only 10 days after their victory.
*** The Narvik map is based on ~April 1940.
: MG42 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MG_42 In service 1942–present
: G43 (1943)
: STG44(Even KB2 prototype is 1942)
: Tiger (1942)
: SturmTiger (1944-1945)
: AT Churchill (Prototype, and, seriously?)
: Valentine tank : n service 1940–60 (Ok, this one works)
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill_tank : 1941
The second major improved Churchill, the Mk VII, was first used in the Battle of Normandy in 1944. The Mk VII improved on the already heavy armour of the Churchill with a wider chassis and the British 75 mm gun, which had been introduced on the Mk VI. (1944 for MK7)
: Churchill Mk VII (A22F) (1,600 produced, together with Mark VIII) 1945 !!!! (Crocodile)
: The first V-1 was launched at London on 13 June 1944, !!!
In service 1938–2006 - This one works okay
... It drives... me... nuts
Different maps being set in different years, ought to have different weapons
I get where you are coming from but don't you think it would be shittier gameplay wise if you were forced to use weapons and vehicles depending on a map all the time?
Again: Historical accuracy doesn't really matter to me when it comes to multiplayer gameplay tbh and I seem to fail to see this argument when people weren't complaining about automatic rifles in BF1 half as bad
Nice! Finally a chance to get my hands on it. Will definately try it out. Can you tell me anything about what's included? Like maps modes etc
I think the posts are typically pretty interesting and give another perspective we don't always see as consumers/outsiders.
People often take the material and turn it into doomsday. Everyone thinks they know whats best, I guess its human nature, but FFS people, get some perspective. There are many moving parts, not everything is black and white. We don't need arm chair CEOs, though there IS room for discussion and gripes. Just ease up on the nuclear options.
Don't cry about micro-transactions/dlc shit because it is the product of the industry AND the consumers who allowed it. Big deal, you spent $110 on a game for 3000 hours of gameplay; you got your monies worth.
tl;dr lets continue to monitor how the product develops before we go bonkers.
Completely agree. I just don't like all this theorycrafting madness when someone changes his Linked In
I suddendly realized I don't even miss his posts here
It somehow reminds me of Red Orchestra 2. I will give it a try when it comes out!
Thread: 66624 Aug 2018, 10:56 AM
Moving to Scrap Yard
I think its more about being force fed diversity/gender justice people are upset about. When a company takes a stance on the issue and calls people who don't agree with their policy 'uneducated' you will certainly piss some people off but back to the point. The majority of gamers are white males. You wouldn't expect Black magazine to force feed pictures of white people into their publication for the sake of diversity. It would be a dumb business move considering their target demographic is black people. A CEO's job is to ensure a profitable product, not change society.
Yeah you are right there. Personally it's not an issue for me because I simply don't care but I can understand where people are coming from on this one
I think a lot stemmed from EA lashing out at consumers calling them 'uneducated' and telling them not to buy the game if they don't accept diversity in their game.
According to analysts from CNBC the game is setting up for failure. Pre-sales are down 85% to previous titles and competitive titles where the gap was usually 20-40%.
Wow I still can't believe that this is such an enormus problem. In my opinion all these idiots complaining about customization because you can choose different races or some shit are just as fucking stupid as the opposite e.g. hardcore feminists and shit. If you don't want to play a black man just don't do it lul
How do you come to all these conclusions you are spitting out here?
Yeah I am a bit sad as well Relic and/or Microsoft didn't give some Info at Gamescom. But well I guess that is because there is not that much to show atm