Profile of WhySooSerious

Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2016, 11:20 AMDangerous-Cloth

uhm you do realize that if my mortars shoot once for putting up smoke ,they are insta barraged by the counter battery and the mortar pit. Then we have multiple vickers, a cromwell and a multitude of lmg tommies that cover everything. The problem is not the bofors, but the synergy of it all..

Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2016, 23:26 PMpussyking

Have played some soviets lately and they suck. Cons are underpowered, maxim is useless and expensive firing arc is a joke, stock mortar sucks, ppsh upgrade is useless since volks got stgs upgrade, penals are expensive, T34 is a waste of fuel.

I cant find a working strat. Evetyhing does not seem to hold in team games. How do you play soviets these days?

Jump back to quoted post6 Jul 2016, 06:19 AMA big guy 4u

The Jackson TD is not balanced.

Why? Its sight. Let me give you this comparison: the SU-85 has the ability to extend its frontal vision at the cost of speed and peripheral vision, this is a risk vs reward mechanism. Its vet 1 ability to moderately increase all-round vision, but this is a veterancy reward.

The jackson meanwhile has both the range and vision at no veterancy to snipe off tanks and simply run.

''But it has thin armor''

That is irrelevant because its visibility + range, not speed, makes its armor irrelevant as it can simply fire and run. I am not for slowing it down as that would not reflect its thin armor, I am for normalizing its sight.