Profile of Sumi

3 panzergrens without any shrecks are more of a problem than with shrecks. Since they can literally obliterate any SW. I don't find this unit much troublesome but yeah they do come early in HQ building as compared to earlier from the T2 building.

The problem with 3 pzgrens is that the army will bleed over time and its upkeep cost will gradually become its achilles heel. They are pretty expensive to handle and maintain. So you fight with pzgrens using time on your side.

I have more game insight than average thank you.

You are obviously trying to engage in "forum war" and I am not really interested.

I am actually interested in improving a game I like and if that includes changes to "OST structure" I have no problem with it. Even the MODE team seem to agree if care to read the changes tested in Winter patch mode.

See my point ? You have no evidences or stats to back up your claims and can't even point out the incorrectness of my claims while you claimed them to be incorrect. You just try to avoid serious conversations and keep running but I guess thats your characteristics.

If you are actually interested in improving a game then please shut up. Your claims are too pro-axis and it looks like you don't even have any experience with allied factions. I have watched your discussions on many forum threads. You just like to rant and waste others time.

Also dont worry these T4 changes you are happy about wont make it to the game.

Ho
Boy, you are very aggressive, did you have a bad day?

Nahh just the usual troll demolishing mode to bring calm and peace across this beautiful land of coh2.org.

Unless you blob Grens with LMGs against someone who doesn’t know how to use indirect fire (Pack, Scott, Calliope) then USF infantry will tear you a new a-hole. Riflemen are definitely the better mainline.

Lol I am amused comparing Grens and Riflemen with the same as pack, scott and calliope? None of the mentioned units are T0 or T1 smh, we are not talking about late game here.

Also I notice something funny, you claim US should use indirect fire to support infantry but claim Grens solo are weak lmao, talk about absurdity.

Learn to read more carefully and you might understand. There is nothing contradicting in what you have quote.

Let me explain this once last time:
Ostheer where design to have an advantage in support weapons and a disadvantage in infatry.
USF where designed to an advantage in infatry and limited access to support weapons.

Now USF have the similar access to good support weapons and that creates an imbalance vs Ostheer.


Actually no, USF simply beat Ostheer. USF won of games 79% vs Ostheer.

Do you understand the importance of Facts and Statistics? You are always quoting tournament win percentage, yes US might be more favorable against OST in 1v1 but that is not my point here, I am talking in general sense of how mostly each OST unit out-performs US unit regardless of its win percentage in tourneys.

Also how does the USF have advantage over OST units in infantry? Do you even read my comments, Ill post for it again for you, the basic starting units for both the factions>

Grens vs Riflemen

240 vs 280 (1-0)
4 models vs 5 models (1-1)
Long range vs Medium range (2-2)
Rifle grenade vs Mk 2 grenade (needs research which costs MP and Fuel) (3-2)
Panzerfaust at 0 vet vs AT nades at vet 1 (4-2)
Free lmg upgrade vs Bars (needs SEPARATE research which costs MP and Fuel) (5-2)
More accuracy vs Less accuracy (6-2)
Can make bunkers vs can't make shit (not confident on this might have changed) (7-2)
can heal other units on frontline vs can't do shit (8-2)
Now doctrinal
can upgrade with G42 which can be used to reveal opponent's units location vs m19191 browning
can be upgraded with 5 men vs no increase in squad size
can camouflage vs no again lol it is getting boring now



Pios vs RE
Close range vs med range (1-1)
190 Mp vs 200 Mp (2-1)
Teller and AI mines vs Tank stun (4-1)
Mg bunkers (5-2)
reinforcement and healing bunkers (6-2)
4 v 4(5 at vet 3) (6-2.5)
I believe I am forgetting something but idk what.

As for the Support weapons I guess you must have read my first comment comparing the Support weapons.

Also, OST is a complete faction unlike US which lacks sniper or non doctrinal arty but makes up for it with LV or pack howie. Conclusion being you can't go on forums and whine about things that you don't like, I have mentioned with stats how OST infantry is superior to US along with their Support weapons but you won't see me crying on forums of each and every post. Game is perfect as is, just fix the UKF faction and that'd be it.