Weapon profiles are a guideline and not a strict rules but moving away from it makes the game worse and not better. When someone can he should try to follow weapon profiles.
AND that's your opinion not a fact.
"Weapon profiles" were meant as an easy guideline for newbies to understand at what ranges and roles their units would perform better. But since balance trumps realism, there has been lot of changes to weapons which depart from this point.
-G43s are not unique. They are better at long range than rifles for the units that can equip them. If the weapon was not useful for long range engagements IRL, we wouldn't had scopes on them (JLI or OH sniper). So the thing that G43 and SVT are not meant for long range is bad as they are semi automatic rifles.
-SP STG44 are more of SMGs. PG STG44 are true assault rifles. Vampir are better than the best Kar98 in the game at long range (Ober Kar)
-Gewehr42 (Falls) are assault rifles and are also better than Ober Kars at far. They are better than the only LMG (DP) for Soviets at far.
-Bars are better than any rifle at range.
-Conscripts Mosin are "long range" weapons, but they need to fight close range against all other "long range" rifles. Against "close mid carbines", they don't have any range they can fight effectively.
SVT is the only weapon functioning as a "carbine" and PG STG the only one functioning as an assault Rifle. So stop with the "weapon profiles" thing. Many thing have changed and been introduced since then.
IF SVT would be "OP" if we buff them cause they are 6 of them? Well you can treat them equally to PF. Give them 3, make them better and replace the rest with Mosins.
Relic Entertainment
보드카 중대 
