Profile of alexshiro

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 62

General Information


Thread: Nerf this shit already!13 Sep 2013, 18:41 PM Some conscripts prevent my 222 from preventing anything. Guards too. Field gun also since 222 has a much bigger target size than T-70 (because logic I guess?). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nerf this shit already!13 Sep 2013, 18:16 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2013, 17:55 PMraw Upgunned Vet 2 AC can effectively deterr a T-70 or outright destroy it if it overextends too much. Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2013, 17:55 PMraw What happens if your enemy isn't stupid? Vet 2 222 still loses against T-70 1v1. Also, it doesn't have self-repair and is deterred by a conscript squad looking at it funny. 222 is one of my favorite units, but it's not a reliable counter to a T-70. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Nerf this shit already!13 Sep 2013, 14:40 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2013, 13:35 PMpanzerjager2 LOL new soviet troll account warning .... This guy is hilarious. Telling to combat T70 with a late game doctrinal unit ROFLMAO. This is like telling soviets to use ISU152 to combat the FHT. Guys, sarcasm. In the other thread he said that the role of MG42 is to boil tea or something like that. If anything, German troll. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG42 Post Patch13 Sep 2013, 14:34 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2013, 13:19 PMrofltehcat http://coh2-stats.herokuapp.com/small_arms/hmg_team_mg42_mp http://coh2-stats.herokuapp.com/small_arms/maxim_m1910_hmg_mp Are these updated? They look the same as a few days ago. Or was I reading between the patch coming out and me playing it, so it got stuck as prepatch in my mind? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG42 Post Patch13 Sep 2013, 11:55 AM How do MG damages compare postpatch? Could somebody link those graphs? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG42 Post Patch12 Sep 2013, 20:55 PM I just saw a MG42 turn. OMFG It turns slower than a SU-85. Don't give it a giant cone of fire if it's actually a liability. This is just bullshit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Suppression modifier?12 Sep 2013, 18:50 PM Suppression modifier applied to suppressed targets from 0.5 to 1 What does this mean? It's from the changes to MG42. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: MG42 Post Patch12 Sep 2013, 18:32 PM I take it back. It's a massive overnerf. I just played a game, swarms of conscripts completely ignoring the mg42s, walking through arcs of fire, chucking molotovs everywhere, then transition into unhittable T-70 and then f everything. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG42 Post Patch12 Sep 2013, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2013, 09:03 AMOZtheWiZARD How about you stop using it the way you've used it before the patch? I see this a lot in the recent games. MG42 shouldn't lead the attack anymore nor should it be a stand alone defense point/ unit. Move it behind your Grenadiers line and use as a support weapon it was always supposed to be and you will be all right. First post I agree with Oz. I actually have stopped using it like before patch, going from MG gren gren to gren gren mg build order, and I'd say it works pretty well when it's far enough behind a lmg gren squad, HMG supresses things that stop to fight the grens and LMG mows down units that move to overwhelm the HMG. Mind you, I've only played 2 games in which I got pretty lucky so far and am "nazi fanboi" so I'll probably switch to complaining about it in a few more games. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch small arms changes DID NOT CHANGE DPS11 Sep 2013, 17:56 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2013, 17:05 PMpqumsieh Until the next patch when bulletins are completely reworked... Good, I was just about to whine about that . I hope the changes are something cool. In: COH2 Balance