I didnt insult you or threaten you with violence.
Nor did I insult you ingame.
I take full responsibility for having said:
"Free speech. You dont have to like it, and it reflects very badly on them, but, free speech.Claiming he "ruined your game", on the otherhand, reflects more on you."
How about you take responsibility for your insults and violence threat.
Thread can be closed. Your issue with someone ingame has nothing to do with this board anyways.
I have not threatened you with violence nor insulted you. Your claim that i did so, is insulting to start with.
I take responsibility of ridiculing you for defending nasty obscene language as freedom of speech, and than claiming that I threatened you and insulted you when I clearly was giving 'what if' example situation in which person who uses same behavior as person in the game, and insults someone in person, would get their teeth knocked out on the spot.
I also ridiculed you for suggesting that freedom of speech means that person can say whatever they want and that it should be just ignored, yet we are having this lenghty slagging match.
Second part where I "insult you" was reference to someone else saying that freedom of speech doesn't exist in Germany..(are you at least German?) and again I disputed that, by suggesting that person who can't say what they want in Germany is either afraid to speak or what they say is something that would get you arrested with good reason (p.s. person that was referenced to, didn't actually get insulted but gave their further argument, which is fair enough)
Furthermore, if you go back through the thread and read the post, in clear and objective way, you might realize that I was actually quite civil about it and always given you a chance to clarify your position. I don't remember using insults as per say, ridicule of paradox statements, yes.
On top of that, if I really threatened you everybody who read this thread would be on my back and I would probably be banned from this site.
P.S. your last couple of posts are starting to sound like reasonable discussion, minus the cynical bits and of the mark claims