Sure, but there is only 1 B4 commander and using it means no conscript ppsh, no 120mm mortar, no T-34/85/ IS2/ISU152. See how your argument works?
Well thats usually what your partner brings in 2v2
Hmm yeah you are right. Without those it is really hard to counter the counterattack doctrine that have b4 and, and hmm no I'm stumped. He has one good thing, you only need to counter that .
you still have a good standard army as ostheer.
Well Shocks and th KV-1 are quite useful in my experience and in 2v2 you need to have counters to both enemy player's armies so not having a Tiger or a Mortar HT can make quite a difference.
You want to play one way and have realised that way has a hard time countering this particular unit. So you want the game to change to better suit your playstyle.
Or you can adapt your playstyle when faced with the b4.
I love the b4 but rarily use it. Why? It gets hard countered so I only ever use it when I know that it can be effective
No I don't. I don't like to be limited in my commander choice and this goes both ways, When I see that my enemy picked some stuka/recon commander I wont be able to use the B-4.
It's the same thing with Jagdtiger/ISU which has been discussed to death.
To make myself clear once more. I don't think the B-4 is op per se. I think the precision shot is too strong and it's vet bonusses are over the top. This ability alone can win you the game, which I think is very boring.
On top of that I'm against the whole black and white balance mechanic where you can only counter a unit with one specific, doctrinal hardcounter. This applies to various commanders and abilities from different factions, some of which have been discussed already.
This is something that makes the gamplay boring and onedimensional.
0
Relic Entertainment
보드카 중대 
