Profile of Abdul

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 896

General Information


Thread: CoH2 Replay Analyzer16 Oct 2013, 08:56 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2013, 08:13 AMpingtoft 1) I couldn't have done this without the help of the programmers at Relic. then why are they not including it in the game? In: News
Thread: CoH2 Replay Analyzer16 Oct 2013, 08:55 AM Such an awesome tool, thanks for making it! Are you going to add additional features like total damage, resources, tanks destroyed/made, all the good stuff we are missing from the coh1 stats and more? In: News
Thread: T34/8516 Oct 2013, 08:21 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2013, 07:57 AMkafrion This thre3ad has been so much derailed . Imo the 34/85 needs either a small cost reduction 10% mp + `10% fuel or a combination of slightly increased weapon reloading speed and some additional damage . Anything more and the commander who has both 120 mm , guards and mark target and doesnt need engies to repair tanks freeing them to plant mines etc will become OP and mess up soviet internal balance You see from the previous numbers I posted the t34/85 can not beat a panzer4 1v1 even with mark vehicle enabled. As for the other commander abilities, guards can button the pnazer4 but so can pg fire shreks on the t34/85. I think if you look at the tank numbers and use this unit you will have no doubt that its severely under performing its cost and role. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Shock Crew on IS2?16 Oct 2013, 07:55 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2013, 07:22 AMrofltehcat I don't think there is a bug. It is simply a chance for the crew shock critical with a weight of 1 on deflection and a chance to do nothing a weight of 4. Code "on_deflected_actions": [ { "$REF": "action\\random_action.lua", "instant": false, "random_actions": [ { "actions": [ { "$REF": "action\\trigger_critical_action.lua", "critical": "vehicle_crew_shocked", "remove_at_health": 1 } ], "weight": 1 }, { "actions": [ { "$REF": "action\\no_action.lua" } ], "weight": 4 } ] } so 20% chance? is it the same for the Tiger? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Shock Crew on IS2?16 Oct 2013, 04:42 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2013, 04:07 AMTurtle I think it may be that the IS-2 is the only tank that can survive enough hits from a tiger that it makes this low chance of crew shock into a common occurrence in games. Most of anything in the Soviet army cannot withstand a direct front to front fight with a Tiger for more than a few hits. Most of the time they escape out of sight or blow up. That said, it couldn't hurt to check and see if there's a bug somewhere in there, either in some numerical value, or the shock chance code itself. yes makes perfect sense and I hope we can have some help on this. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T34/8516 Oct 2013, 04:37 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2013, 00:03 AMTurtle I really don't want the T-34/85 to be equal to the Panther. The reality was that only the turret and gun was upgraded, the hull was mostly the same. However, the additions to the turret were substantial, it had a turret basket, positions for loaders, commander, and gunner, so a 3 man turret. In the 76 version, they would stand on top of ammo boxes to reach the 2 man turret controls. T-34 crews would steal the seats out of American supplied Shermans. It doesn't take crack German training to load a gun quickly. Increasing penetration to 160 will never do that and here are the numbers to illustrate the change: T-34/85 finishing off a Panther: (960/160)8.575/(40.74%) = 126.288 sec T-34/85 (buffed) finishing off a Panther: (960/160)8.575/(59.25%) = 86.835 sec Panther finishing off T-34/85: (800/160)*6.45/(100%) = 32.25 sec I think you can see that currently T34/85 takes 126 seconds to finish a panther and post suggested buff takes 86 seconds, where as the panther takes only 32 seconds to finish T34/85. The current difference is so insanely huge. I hope that clarifies my suggestion. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T34/8516 Oct 2013, 04:36 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2013, 22:49 PMDietBrownie -Remember Remember Remember And do you remember how many arguments and inflammatory comments and personal attacks he was responsible for? Every topic he got into turned into nasty arguments and flame war until he started getting so much flak he had to make some changes, but its all calculated. Just look at all his latest dishonest statements making it sound like he "never" gets out of topic and attacks anyone. Give him some breathing room and he will get back at it. If you cant remember here is a nice little example for you to see how he derailed a thread out of its topic and argued about something he had absolutely no knowledge about. The forum is full of worse examples too. http://www.coh2.org/topic/8384/tanks-lose-accuracy-on-the-move By the way, no offense intended, but using "nullist" analogy, with 22 posts you would have to be a "second account". Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2013, 04:31 AMDietBrownie He won't, you know why, because it most likely doesn't exist. I am using it right now, and this really makes you sound like a "second account". In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Shock Crew on IS2?16 Oct 2013, 03:46 AM Ok, that makes sense now. The Tiger gets a bit too much shock crew on the IS2. I really think it needs to be toned down a bit. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Shock Crew on IS2?15 Oct 2013, 19:13 PM I noticed the IS2 receives allot of shock crew when going against the Tiger, but does not cause as much shock crew on Tiger. Given the IS2 has the higher damage per shot shouldn't the IS2 bounced shots be giving more shock crew to the Tiger? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is Relic taking action against drophackers in coh2?15 Oct 2013, 17:53 PM I just got this reply from Relic for two submissions I made: Thank you for reporting this. We have taken action on this matter. - The Relic Enforcement Team I obviously don't know the action they took, but I am glad that they are replying and find this an encouraging sign. In: COH2 Gameplay