Profile of Omega_Warrior

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2561

General Information


Thread: Petition to revert crushing change21 May 2016, 01:09 AM Units shouldn't need a cheezy tactic to be viable. It was never even intended to be as big a part of the game as it is. If it was any other mechanic that was wiping squads in seconds there would be a unanimous call to remove it. But just because it was never dealt with in coh1 players got too used to it. I say good riddance, the community should have been weened off this stupid machanic years ago. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [week 3 may preview] alternative to crush removal19 May 2016, 20:14 PM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2016, 20:09 PMFiresparks this is what testing is primarily about. I am fairly certain that nerfing the chassis rotational rate will have minimal effect on their overall mobility, but it's really something you need to actually test to know for certain. and 34 deg/s is still decent while removing a huge chunk of their crush ability. It's the same rotational rate as the t34/85 and the 75mm sherman. How is a units ability to change direction, minimal to mobility. It's pretty much half of it. It directly effects the units ability to get out of danger and circle targets. It's not like all maps are straight lines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [week 3 may preview] alternative to crush removal19 May 2016, 20:07 PM But what about the effectiveness of those two units. Cromwell and M10 depend on their mobility to be effective. Why should we nerf them just to keep a machinic in the game that was never intended to be a large part of it in the first place. Shouldn't we also start adding crush potential to units cost then if we are consdering it a large part of the game? Are we never going to allow there to be an medium vehicle with high mobility in the game, just so we can keep crushing around? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hetzer coming? Ambush Assault Doctrine19 May 2016, 09:51 AM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2016, 09:37 AMGodrick Actually Hetzer is a real thing - I've received this bulletin yesterday you realize this thread is 2 years old, right? And the bulletin is just a bug. It's not the first time a bulletin not meant for release slipped through the cracks. The hetzer was never made a TD because it overlapped with the stug and jagdpanzer to much, so they made it a flame vehicle. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [OKW] Possible alternatives for the MG42 call in18 May 2016, 21:21 PM Jump back to quoted post18 May 2016, 19:59 PMPencilBatRation Though an attractive option, it is highly unlikely to happen as they don't have the 3d models for OKW vehicles. Yes they do. Someone posted pictures of it a while ago. In: Lobby
Thread: May 17th Update18 May 2016, 19:45 PM Guys the Gallian army is based on the french, not the germans. The edelwiess has far more in common with the french ARL 44 then anything german. Not to mention the blue uniforms look super french. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [OKW] Possible alternatives for the MG42 call in18 May 2016, 19:37 PM Definitely hull down for defense atleast. Just makes sense. In: Lobby
Thread: Week 3 Update to the Balance Mod18 May 2016, 19:23 PM Jump back to quoted post18 May 2016, 19:01 PMFrost Finnaly that fuckimg dumb M10 crush has been removed Yeah, now people will actually realize how crappy armor company is now that they can't just abuse the M10. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Week 3 Update to the Balance Mod18 May 2016, 19:18 PM Jump back to quoted post18 May 2016, 18:55 PMImagelessbean These are generally good, but the removal of crush from tanks is going to make for pathing nightmares. Crush is an important mechanic reducing it to heavy only means very few if any use of it. Is the issue that Cromwells crush too well? But it doesn't effect pathing at all, only infantry crush was removed. Vehicles don't stop for infantry regardless, so at most the worse is that you'll see infantry models clip through tanks. Also I guess this means the only tank that's really able to crush infantry now is the 105 sherman. Pretty much everything else with heavy crush is too slow to actually pull it off. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: May 17th Update17 May 2016, 23:02 PM Jump back to quoted post17 May 2016, 21:38 PMVuther Never played it, but heard about it and immediately thought after "Uh?", "Well I guess it doesn't not kinda make sense" Yeah it's a fun game. It's like WW2 except your most ruthless soldier is a 13 year old girl, and you occasionally escape the the horrors of war with a beach vacation. In: COH2 Gameplay