Profile of Omega_Warrior

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2561

General Information


Thread: Improve ranking system, Relic9 Feb 2015, 21:57 PM Seeing your own elo would be a nice addition. Seeing your enemies and allies elo would be detrimental to the game. It would cause players to leave games they view as unfair and allow users to fix custom lobby games against weaker opponents like back in vCOH. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New faction British??9 Feb 2015, 21:04 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2015, 20:25 PMbraciszek At least those arent mainline units meant to do all the dirty work, What Japanese tank would really stand up against t34's/shermans? And the IS-2's and the like? Without... Without being completely wacky, it wouldnt be able to be implemented in CoH2. chi-nu and ho-ri III is all they would need to have the same level armor as doctrinal allied armor and tier 3 wher. And they aren't that much of a leap. As for the heavies they would be a no heavy faction like the us but make up for it with plenty of vehicle snares and infantry based at abilities. A invasion of Japan type army could work without the need for crazy experimental stuff. And would retain the Japanese type feel. Anything a better then more Germans. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New faction British??6 Feb 2015, 04:44 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Feb 2015, 04:36 AMKothre I just want a Japanese faction more than anything. If whatever new Axis faction that comes with the hypothetical British one is German AGAIN, I'm going to cry. Me too! Or atleast a primarily italian army. If it's just another flavor Germany I would be extremely disappointed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF & Ost, early game balance4 Feb 2015, 13:26 PM You can't just nerf rifles. They are the only real unit the US can build early game and they need to invest far more then even the soviets to unlock their abilities just to unlock their upgrades. If rifles were just as good as grens they would have the worst early game, if not just become the worst faction overall considering they rely on them so heavily. They don't even have access to elite infantry most the time so rifles are supposed to fill that role as well. What you are basically asking for is for the US to have an early game consisting only of grens and nothing else. How can you call that balanced. What could be done is to possibly delay smoke grenades til a officer is researched, so they can't just invalidate HMGs so early, and raise the cost of the luitenant to delay the m20, and m15 a bit. A few minor buffs for wher units would also help as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch 03 feb4 Feb 2015, 01:21 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2015, 18:35 PMMajorBloodnok Same reply: wait and see Did you see the reply today from the former Balance designer? Did he say something today. Where? In: Lobby
Thread: USF vs OKW4 Feb 2015, 01:17 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2015, 02:50 AMAlexzandvar I said Scott, not Stuart. I meant scott. Scotts need things to spot for them. Shermans can harass and stuff on their own. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF vs OKW3 Feb 2015, 00:14 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2015, 19:27 PMAlexzandvar The sherman is a POS that will die to a well microed gang of volk shreks every time. I would much rather have something doing consistent squad wipes like a Scott rather than something that is basically useless as AT, and it's AI ability is extremely RNG based. except Stuarts are useless without support. Atleast Shermans can hold the line while the infantry is reinforcing. And even the smallest mistake with the Stuarts will get them wiped in a blink of the eye. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: If you could ask Relic one question...31 Jan 2015, 02:51 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jan 2015, 02:27 AMqduffy Slim. It does a decent job of providing flanking opportunities and making tanks more interesting in combat. Adding side armor is possible, but I don't think the benefit would feel that tangible. This makes me a bit sad. With the current state of heavy armor dominance, and flanking being rather difficult to pull off I would think side armor would add quite a bit more of a middle ground in between completely surrounding an enemy and actually flanking an opponent. Although I know you guys said you were working on something, I'm curious what you guys at relic think would be more tangible in stabilizing the late game. In: Lobby
Thread: If you could ask Relic one question...31 Jan 2015, 02:27 AM Well this is a nice surprise! In: Lobby
Thread: 57mm AT gun does not camo29 Jan 2015, 22:26 PM I believe the soviet camo ability works on any at gun, even if they capture it since it is a doctrinal ability, not a ability of the AT gun itself. In: COH2 Bugs