Profile of Sarantini

Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2013, 22:04 PMtuvok

all I ever use is this page
http://www.coh2.org/thread

Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2013, 19:32 PMBudwise

DanielD:

-Doctrine system is poor, no strategic choices at all. Probably my biggest gripe. Gone are the days of seeing a doctrine choice and adapting because guess what, 3 doctrines have the same ability and you cant even choose a path to unlock them. Its all done for you in case we're too nubbish to make a strategic choice like in COH1.
-Resource system lessens strategic importance in map strategy. Why rush a fuel if you get plenty of fuel from right outside your base?
-You can cap with an AT gun ffs. Remember the days of choosing to cap or fight? Another strategic choice gone.
-Without a fuel investment for upgrades axis has no strategic choice on how to spend fuel. You just tech freely. Another choice gone.
-Cold Tech is a gimmick that dumbs down flanking and agressiveness. It looks pretty but it dumbs down the pace of the game and makes early flanking near impossible on some maps.
-Shall i mention pay to win commanders? I choose to spend $5 every month for the new OP flavor of the month, now there's a strategic choice that Relic likes!
-You cant even choose to strategically soft retreat because units cant fire backwards anymore. Yet another downgrade from COH microing.
-Try to lay a german single anti infantry mine xD... Talk about stupid downgrade.

Sooo many strategic choices that made COH1 great are gone.

Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2013, 15:21 PMNullist

Game was a bit rushed :/ Patch process is huuuge and long, but it is apparently systematic.

Inversely, the fact that these problems arw so obvious, and their cause is known atleast by the Devs, means game can and will get better. Thats why I stress Molotovs in several threads as early garrison counter, becaue Inpresume the more obvious systemix problems are already being accounted for, sooner or later.

Ideally, what do we want?
-RNade/Molotov ewuivalency as counters in extreme esrly game. Asymmetric if possible.
-Better efficacy of existing developed building hard counters, such as Flamers and Mortar.
-Better Sniper efficiency vs buildings (though not so much that infantry cant "hide" a bit vs sniper in one.
-Removal of unpredictable catastrophic building collapse.
-Possibly removal or adjustment of buildings overlooking fuel (such as hp reduction)
+Pwrsonally, though Ive mentioned it but few verbally supported, general increase of armor efficacy in structural damage vs buildings. I want to see buildings deliberstely destroyed for tactical advantage.
Im not sure how to spreadnthat thriughout the Tank, TD and Assault gun division, but preferably in in a manner that favors higher calibre weapons.