|
I liked the weather effects in coh2, I want to see them again and improved upon |
You mean those Infrared "Assaults" that the Germans actually made use of?
I seriously do not understand why you can't seem to grasp the difference between things that were used in WWII and things that were not used in WWII.
I can’t seem to understand why you can’t understand the concept of a video game |
Yeah, tell me how the reputation has not suffered after the "Historically accurate" CoH2 single player campaign.
all the more reason why adding the BP isn’t a big deal |
And to inflict one more reputational hit by declaring that historicity is important to us and then ignoring it.
lmao historical accuracy is not why relics reputation took a hit |
Tell me how you won. Because all I see is ad hominem. You either ignore counter arguments you can't refute or you just pivot into a different subject or "Oh I was pretending to be dumb haha" by just saying it doesn't matter.
because no one can prove me wrong, you have it in your mind coh2 is about historical accuracy when it isn’t , the franchise is chock full of units that are rediculous and you come with stupid reasons why it should be included |
It doesn't matter what league they are in, did they participate in the war? No, the discussion is closed. Only the fact of participation is important, the rest does not matter.
doesn’t matter the BP is here to stay, relic isn’t going to nuke a unit that money and time was spent on because coh2.org, a small fraction of the community, threw a hissy fit |
in fact, the addition of the Black Prince is tantamount to the addition of the T-64. Because these are two tanks not participating in the Second World War. Once again, taking a certain time period, you take its limitations. There are no Black Princes in WWII, In Operation Unthinkable? Yes, he might be there.
because the BP and the t64 are totally in the same league |
Panther rounds bouncing off Shermans is something that can happen at certain degrees but is mainly attributed to balance
Also Pershings in Normandy was in the first game. I doubt they had lots of money for research on their hands back then ... and again: They made it clear that they wan't to be more historical accurate this time. Don't see how the first game being historical inaccurate sometimes does affect that.
Also: Pershing was at least used in WW2, BP not
Why is there suddenly so much straw here ?
Just because one doesn't want a non WW2 tank in a WW2 game doesn't mean that he wants a 100% accurate simulator game
yes panthers can bounce off Sherman’s at certain angles, but not at 100 meters, also it doesn’t take money to google search when the Pershing was used lmfao |
No.
Is that supposed to be a joke?
Yes, you are. You're insisting others are arguing a lost cause, but your entirely argument is a faulty premise. You are clearly projecting.
Why are you arguing about a videogame yourself, if it is apparently unimportant?
because you just proved my point, I’ve already ready won this argument, this is simply for entertainment |
V1s were used to attack ground targets. They're missiles. The Germans used them to attack Antwerp directly in the later stages of the war. I'm not sure how you're defining "Tactical capacity" precisely, and why you think that's somehow the same as something not actually being used in /any/ capacity.
Yes, they did use Infrared sights. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zielger%C3%A4t_1229
The Sturmtiger was indeed used in combat. Please, do "get started", because I'm not sure if you've actually got any real argument there.
Please stop projecting.
Show me an instance where a German field officer called in a v1 strike an enemy formation while actively engaged, I’m not projecting anything, crying about historical accuracy in a video game is an oxymoron |
0
United States
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
