Profile of rqd

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 65

General Information


Thread: How's the post-patch Comet?11 Oct 2019, 06:59 AM Its acceleration is still not good enough. Should be 2.4 or higher, to make it a fast tank like panther. Now it shares the same acceleration value of 2.1 with panzer iv h, almost the worst acc. rate profile among mediums. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: motar pit10 Oct 2019, 13:27 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2019, 12:50 PMT.R. Stormjäger Just give UKF a T0 or T1 mortar and lock the pit behind a T1 Anvil/Hammer choice. Is this what they did to usf ages ago? I think their t0 mortar was added in a patch. Now ukf don't get easy acess to early smoke, so this would be nice. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: motar pit10 Oct 2019, 07:49 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2019, 06:32 AMullumulu on most maps it is pretty easy to find a smart spot where it can shot all the time the frontlines and can be defend easily Almost every unit in ukf platoon command post cost you a lot manpower except for sappers. You can't always get a mortar pit in right place at right time. And not always wanting 2 mortar fire power. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: motar pit10 Oct 2019, 07:40 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Oct 2019, 07:18 AMKatitof You have a doctrine with regular, mobile, cheaper mortar. That usf mortar has worst aoe profile. And yeah, thats only a doctrinal choice. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: motar pit10 Oct 2019, 02:49 AM So why is ukf forced to buy 2 mortars to get indirect support? Or forced to spend ammo on getting a base 25 pdr barrage. Can't we get the mortar pit with 200mp and only 1 mortar? Suggestion: mortar pit cost 200mp to bulid, only 1 mortar available. Lock the 2 second mortar behind vet1, requires 150mp 30 sec to unlock 2nd mortar. What do you say. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T34 Ram10 Oct 2019, 02:26 AM Keep the ram, since in 2v2 matches 2 soviets can't take down superheavys effienctly without t-34-76 ram & il-2 bombing combo. Su-85 can't chase retreating axis armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M20 over nerf rofl9 Oct 2019, 03:48 AM I think it should have decreased pop or upgrade cost to compensate. Can't just take away things and get nothing in return. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar too potent against mediums29 Sep 2019, 16:06 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Sep 2019, 15:59 PMVipper Kv-8 actually has an AT gun and gun beat a PzIV: KV-8 .... -45mm penetration from 50/50/50 to 140/80/60 -45mm AOE from 2.5 to 0.5 -45mm AOE distance from 0.625/0.9375/1.25 to 0.15/0.2/0.25 This gun...no it won't damage p4 unless they run into each other... it is effective against lights but not a panzer 4... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?29 Sep 2019, 15:50 PM I think they lose health too fast in early game combats, if they can't get into cover in time. Maybe need to buff their RA out of cover a little and cut some in cover RA buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar too potent against mediums29 Sep 2019, 15:28 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Sep 2019, 11:57 AMmrgame2 I think brumbar can be more effective against allies blob. Right now i enjoy using ostwind more. Brumbar rng aoe and slowness make it more susceptible to 60 td. You should try holding fire and use attack ground instead of auto fire, it can be really rewarding. Need a lot micro though. That kind of nerf is acceptable because no one gets a brummbar to fight mediums. Brummbar is performing the same role as soviet kv8, it doesn't need to have some penertration like this. Now it has good chance taking down snared mediums and that seems confusing to me. I do think after they nerfed the range and armour of brummbar, it should at least have 960 hp like panther. But no better penertration than t-34, the deflection damage is enough to let grens to snare the flanking medium. In: COH2 Balance