I havent refused to acknowledge anything.
You simply haven't presented anything worth acknowledging.
Nobody agrees with you.
Your numbers are false and misrepresentative.
You compare vet 0 units to vet 2 units.
You conveniently omit Sov dmg bonus in your vet calculations.
You ignore Dev quotes on what is the intended use of units.
You are absolutely nobody to accuse me of bias due to preferring to play one faction.
The illegitimacy of your balance observations is resulting from you misrepresenting them with false numbers and making false implications that "t34 should" be able to, in your imagination, be able to do stuff.
Your stuff isnt BASED on anything valid. Nothing at all.
I have provided you the source of my numbers provided by relic in the changelog! if i was wrong with my numbers than tell me what the actual numbers are. you did not provide anything to show that you even know what the stats actually are. if you don't know what the stats are then you have no right to say that my numbers are false.
i would talk about soviet veterancy when i have the actual numbers on those. sadly, relic doesn't show veterancy stats and the website that show all the stats in the game is now down.
i do not ignore dev quotes i looked at the site and read it, i just said that i don't like their concept on the t34. even with my suggested penetration buff it still would not change their concept.
i played all game modes, i have tested every unit in the game. i played long enough to understand each units strengths and weaknesses. i play both factions pretty evenly. i observe my own replays and i watch propagandacasts to see how other people play.
i may not have much credibility because i don't work in relic, but i've done a lot more than playing one match and complaining about it.