Profile of RepoRogue

And like I said, none of those stats matter. Can u read? I said "don't get technical with me." The only stat that matters is TIME TO KILL. Put any stock allied medium in the range of a pak and a raketen. I dare you to tell me that the pak will kill the tank faster than the rak.

The Pak will kill the medium tank faster, on average.

That's a shame. What about changing the crew to have a smaller size modifier so they are slightly harder to hit/insta decrew?

Target size is basically irrelevant against AoE damage, which is what the Raketen has a problem with due to clumping. The extra crew member already gives it extra durability against small arms fire.

Are you able to fix the bug where you cant allow the Rak to move when cloaked (ie have it decloak, move, recloak) like camo'd ZIS/Paks can?

That's not a bug, that is working as intended. Take a look at the patch notes where the Raketen got reworked. Moving while cloaked was deemed too powerful for a unit of its cost and relative safety due to retreat.

The only difference between the 'live' pre-WBP Tiger and the one advertised in the respective patchnotes is the reduced near AOE (1 m instead of the intended 0.25 m), which had an almost negligible effect on its overall AI-performance.


The AI of the Tiger was and still is more than fine, despite the anecdotal evidence and conspiracy theories circling around here obviously.

This is exactly what we found in our testing which, admittedly, was much less rigorous/thorough than your own! It seemed to have close to zero impact on the average time to kill. The intention was to reduce the unavoidable bleed that heavies inflicted across the board while still maintaining their strong anti-infantry firepower. They still should and do kill infantry or support weapons when they stick around, but shouldn't be quite as punishing in the first shot out of the fog of war.

There seems to be a placebo effect where people have decided that heavies are bad now and so they see heavies performing badly.

Also also thank god for finally fixing the pfusies nade bug. Can we get a fix for paratrooper support squad zook camo too?

What's the issue with Support Para camo?

Thanks for correcting me, I thought since they're elite squads, they cost more to reinforce like Shocks/Guards.

They're relatively fragile on a per model basis for elite infantry, which is why they're relatively cheap to reinforce. I also think it was done to push their power level in comparison to Rangers.

Thetruerhy was asking why PGrens get beaten by Assault Engineers, despite being more expensive and coming later in the game. I was curious as to how this match-up plays out on average, so I ran some tests. First batch involved 46 1v1 tests between PGrens and AssGineers.

6 tests where Assault Engineers charged PGrens in cover. PGrens won 6/6 without losing a single model.

10 CQC tests at vet 0. PGrens won 12/20.

10 CQC tests at vet 3. PGrens won 10/20.

Thetruerhy refused to believe me without video proof, so I redid the tests and have uploaded the results here. These tests had almost identical results:

6 tests where Assault Engineers charged PGrens in cover. PGrens won 6/6 without losing a single model.

10 CQC tests at vet 0. PGrens won 12/20.

10 CQC tests at vet 3. PGrens won 9/20.

I'll be running some more tests, hopefully tonight, in other conditions which might favor AssGineers more, such as tests as close to 10 range as possible (where AssGineers should have the biggest advantage) and Assault Engineers charging a shorter distance into 10 range cover.