Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?31 Oct 2019, 01:29 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2019, 21:18 PMButcher The range reduction killed the Brummbär for me. All while an ISU at 70 range wiping squads is obviously perfectly fine by the balance teams standards (I don't care about the price or that the ISU is doctrinal. The basic concept of being able to wipe stuff at long ranges should either apply to both sides or to no side at all). Make the Brummbär more expensive and revert the range to 40. It should be an option to seriously hurt your opponents infantry and achieve breakthroughs. Currently it's just a more clumsy Ostwind that also can't even deflect shots reliably. I think it's ridiculous that the Brummbär is nerfed because it could reliably fight AT guns, yet the KV8 is perfectly fine tackling multiple Paks. Yes about isu and balance team inconsistencies. Why is that tank have better speed and rear armor than elefant? Why is flanking so less rewarding for axis players? Wehr player basically have to react with elefant doc against it. While isu provide both AT and AI. And long range wipes hurt wehr most. 4 man squad, weapon team reliance, pak is their only 60TD.. Like i said, balance team is too concentrate to provide hard counters to wehr since its the base design. I think now is good time to review for Wehr instead against Wehr In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?30 Oct 2019, 12:17 PM I consider that as downgrade. I like my ostwind at t3. Cannons are now deadly enough to push infantry and also deter light tanks. Its mobile enough to avoid med tanks. Imo ostwind is in a best spot. Replace with stuge is going to face same problems of aec steward t34 trolling it like brother stug. Brumbar is poor non doctrine, and not worth a doctrine slot If anything, i rather replace stug with puma. Wehr can have a mobile 60 AT. Or make puma into mechinsed assualt in place of pgren carrier. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?30 Oct 2019, 08:28 AM Yes that's what i meant. This rof is widely given vet but panther got armor and blitz as other vet, which their present uses are questionable these days. Some additional for blitz Split some armor values to hp Then we are talking In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?30 Oct 2019, 08:14 AM No really. The past blitz was ok, but not today. It is simply not enough. I would think if it also makes moving accuracy and turret lock faster. Then it make sense and scale better. It makes axis tanks more fearful offensively and defensively When you think about it, panther effectively gets only faster rof through the 3 vet levels. Poor scaling to costs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?30 Oct 2019, 08:05 AM Yes really, is questionable to dedicate one vet level to it. It is short with cooldown and so. It is negated with status alignments. For heavies it got further nerfed. Offensively it is slave to moving accuracy. Defensively, a double vet Jackson or su85 sorta over rule it if chased. I mean you pop blitz when health is already low. Same case issue, a bit more micro for its cost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My personal issues with UKF30 Oct 2019, 05:22 AM For me, only need to make bofor and aec non exclusive. And give aec phosphorus shot as anti garrison anti mg. And they are good enough In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?30 Oct 2019, 04:27 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2019, 22:05 PMAlphrum If allied TD's get looked at, t4 wont need buff Seriously this would solve a lot of issues imo. A far accuracy nerf Or only 55 range Or less vet bonus Wehr t4 design feels really handicapped and jailed since super 60TD arrive In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Hot garbage or Actually fine?30 Oct 2019, 04:24 AM As wehr boy in 2v2, i also like to add my views. Overall t4 is least cost effective for Wehr now and that poses a big problem since its design for it. Too much micro for the costs. Too long xp to vet. Too lousy vet bonus for its cause. Armor is pointless. Blitz is questionable. In top 1v1, meta now is straight to tiger. I think tiger needs a pen buff btw. Why it loses to panther and is2 makes no sense.. In my 2v2, its still less efficient since we get locked out by 60TD. Flanking is handicap by panther low turret and moving accuracy. I mean it can work, but why can cheaper allies rely less on micro? Yes now i rush to t4 and only back teching for ostwind, normally. I go ostwind first if i see infantry blobbing. P4 is in a bad spot. Stug is in a bad spot. I think pwafer is fine. But you need to get real close to be effective. Katsuya is more easier to use and deal heavier damages to weapon teams from safer distance. Another case for more micro work I said scotts need a pop increase to be same as pwafer. While it doesn't do big sudden damage it is chipping away from hard to counter distance. For its survivability and crew repair, why is it cheaper than pwafer? Brum i dont use now since it's need heavy babysitting. It is opposite, 1v1 good, 2v2 not so good. No point in 3v3 and 4v4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to counter Ostheer mg spam as Usf29 Oct 2019, 04:09 AM AFAIK usf mortar has slightly slower ready aim time vs wehr mortar, but they have faster reload. The other specs seems same, except the slightly lower range and counterbarrage. Not bad for t0 unit. I think Usf mortar is more accurate too. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is USF cluster bomb too unbalanced now?29 Oct 2019, 04:06 AM soviet ptab also sucks looking at the video Light arty barrage 100 muni CB 110 muni Frag 180 muni Ptab 180 muni IL2 bomb 200 muni I think should be this way CB 160 muni Frag 160 muni Ptab 160 muni In: COH2 Balance