Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: State of Heavies18 Jan 2020, 10:00 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2020, 22:03 PMVipper I brought this issue up a couple of year back https://www.coh2.org/topic/68044/rear-armor-of-some-vehicles-needs-to-be-reduced only to have to waste my time responding to the usual suspect. The hood new is that it seem it get the attention eventually so some of the value have been lowered. I also brought this up many times. Also rear armour is 50% of a tank Ever since that 60td and their sweet vet bonus that basically ignore your armor with either their pen,damage,rof, range, accuracy or just deadly effective mixture zoning out axis tanks The real reason for tigersss, is because as axis players highlighted, it is a crutch unit. And we are thankful for the call in changes. It is fact allies still go through more phases and build variations after the call in changes So if we want to stop stalling for heavy, then axis TD like panthers and jp4 needs help. I guess our cries over the years has been coincidence with the call in changes that becomes even clearer In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of Heavies18 Jan 2020, 09:51 AM Im playing many 2v2 and 4v4. Imo heavies are mostly fine. Performance is where they need to be. Offering good power and durability. 60td and ATg still eats up tigers like fruits. Tigers durability and prone to counters haven't changed. They can be delayed 1 or 2 cp, and it will be good. You don't want them too late, games to run over 30 mins to field them, and then it is over in another 5. You dont want them too expensive that reduces population. If anything, make axis t4 perform for their cost. like we are seeing more tigers and then blaming stalling for heavies or lack of choices. When it is problem caused by over weakening a part of a game play that forces axis to over rely over call in tigers In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank balance overhaul18 Jan 2020, 09:44 AM It is too late to make many changes. But also tanks performance are generally fine now. Outside of 2 portion. First is heavies can be delayed 1 or 2 cp. That is good enough. Second is more crucial one, that axis t4 perf/cost just need a slight improvement. Did you watch the latest tightrope cast, a panther misses 3 times chasing a katsuya and got itself killed. This is the bug bear we facing. A simple vet bonus on panther moving accuracy here. A cheaper pwafer there. A better armor vet to brumbar. A faster vet for jp4. Some examples to make t4 worth the cost. Or we can not do vet buff, a reduction in their cost and pop, or a decrease in 60td max range effectiveness or lower their sweet sweet vet bonus. And tank combat will be better from start to late games. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the Brummbar perfectly fine?15 Jan 2020, 04:27 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2020, 14:29 PMVipper Actually it is: If you go T4 you can either get a Panther to deal with IS-2/Pershing/Croc or a Brumbar to deal with infatry. A Tiger can deal S-2/Pershing/Croc and with infatry. So there is little reason to go for the T4 option as long as Tigers (and other super heavies) come with good commander abilities. That's the thing ain't it. Cost of fielding a panther and brumbar is too heavy. Now im training with ostwind or stug + tiger. This composition probably matches allies late game costs. As i find having more late game reinforcement buffer. Panther is sadly not as reliable imo, over hit misses and waiting for its turret to lock and reload. And brumbar being brumbar here In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the Brummbar perfectly fine?14 Jan 2020, 14:12 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2020, 14:09 PMKatitof First of all, only 1 allied faction got T4, which is equivalent of ost T3. Secondly, ost T4 already got discount, you're not getting it at T3 cost. which faction is that? T4 is T4, no matter what faction. Wehr reaching T4, ok. But building the structure and building the units. Not ok. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the Brummbar perfectly fine?14 Jan 2020, 13:51 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2020, 13:46 PMVipper That is another problem with current implementation of Super heavies: A Tiger can do the job of both a Brumbar and Panther adequately. As long as thing remain like that there will be little reason to invest into T4 I dont think is problem with super heavies. It is problem with perf/cost for wehr T4. Allies still go T4 with their super heavies. IF anything super heavies is Axis late game band aid, especially for Wehr. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the Brummbar perfectly fine?14 Jan 2020, 13:37 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2020, 00:57 AMStug life I play team games, but brumbar is non existent here cause of the mass TD spam word! why get brumbar when you get rocket arty. Brumbar is sitting ducks against at least 4 60TD aiming at it. Brumbar is far from potent in team games because of case mate and low range and slow ass. IF anything, it works best in 1v1 or 2v2 since 1 or 2 60TD gives it more time to escape reposition. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 82mm vs 120mm Mortar against Flak HQ14 Jan 2020, 13:32 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2020, 05:12 AMSkysTheLimit +1 nope. team game cancer if so. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Nerf IR Halftrack14 Jan 2020, 13:29 PM I think brit arty flare is also OP in recon. No dont nerf IRHT. Instead switch with resoruce truck. IRHT become doctrine. resource truck become non-doc, at 1 pop each. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Cancer That Is Soviet Field HQ11 Jan 2020, 05:25 AM relic wont prioritise this, since it is for team games and map basis. Granted some earlier fixes were on team games. So idk where they stand. I think once converted to fhq, maybe make the building have a -25% recieved damage penalty. Since coh2 engine cannot do the decap thing from coh1. In: COH2 Balance