Profile of varunax

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 210

General Information


Thread: Airborne and Pathfinders lower CP ?15 Mar 2016, 14:16 PM Reduce the cost of Pathfinders to 220. They cost the same as Jaeger light infantry recon squads, but perform horribly worse. They are weaker versions of Jaeger recon squads, therefore they should cost less. Change the reinforce speed of Paratroopers to match Rangers. I have no idea why Paras take so long to reinforce compared to Rangers (or any other infantry for that matter). Both are elite units but Para's have around a 2-3 times slower reinforce speed delaying the time they can be redeployed back onto the field. The P47 strafing ability needs it's accuracy increased and munitions cost decreased to 200. That or it needs to be able to strafe both tanks and infantry instead of just tanks. Compared to the Stuka close air support, it's just pathetic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen OP with Vet patch 13 Mar 2016, 05:15 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2016, 01:54 AMCulainn I play USF also, but prefer playing Axis. I like to play all the factions except Brits, where I have very few games. Soviets are my favorite Allied faction to play. In fact I'm better with Soviets than anyone else even though I have less games as them than Axis. You can find my posts about the T34-76 not needing to be buffed in this forum. That is because I LIKE using the T34-76 and know how good it is even though many people do not understand its use. I say what I think about the units, it doesn't matter what side I play as. However I'm pretty sure the posters here in this thread who are so quick to use ad hominem attacks to discredit me are actually the ones interested in maintaining the current imbalance for their own interests. Joseph Tldr I'm the best Soviet player better than everyone therefore riflemen op. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing tank buged12 Mar 2016, 16:23 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2016, 15:59 PMMuad'Dib Have you reported this? Do you know if there's a problem with other vehicles? I mentioned it like 4-5 months ago lol. Also, I don't think it affects any other tanks. Just the Pershing. But these Lolic patches take like 3 months just to fix anything. I don't think they've even had time to touch the Pershing especially with the whole vet mess. Until they correct the 45 range to 50 range (which it's supposed to have and also bugged) it's really funny when people say this tank is fine... when it clearly isn't. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Stun grenade 12 Mar 2016, 16:10 PM Yes... the game is bugged. Stun grenades prevent retreats. I don't know about it happening only 50% of the time, but it's happened to me literally every time someone's thrown a stun grenade at my squads. I can't retreat them and they lay on the ground like retards until shot to death. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some things never change12 Mar 2016, 15:45 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2016, 15:02 PMHighfiveeeee I'm afraid that the new war spoil system comes > 2 years too late. Most players left are the fanbase (about 10.000 more or less) that have sticked with the game for a long time and also have most of the commanders (or at least some additional content). It seems like relic really tries to not make money if you look at their ideas. Without their ridiculous greed they would have made at least ten times the money. Right... that's why they tried to "MMO" Company of Heroes Online with a pay2win cash shop system lol. You don't think that has "greed" written in it? There's a reason why it flopped miserably and is never talked about ever again. In: Lobby
Thread: Pershing tank buged12 Mar 2016, 15:39 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2016, 13:49 PMKpen97 The Perhsing heavy tank isn't bugged. One at 13 cp it out ranges tigers, panzer 4's, panthers at times. Its devastating he rounds it fires destroys a whole squad in almost one shot. It fires a high velocity round that can penetrate through buildings and natural barriers e.g trees, tall bushes and hedge groves. it has a frontal mounted mg. it has a vet ability that throws grenades automatically. LOL so you want to pershing to be 10cp, plz so lets put the tiger 1 at 10cp and see what happens. And i use this commander and people use it in ESL. Are you a troll? 1. Yes it's bugged. Using Combined Arms ability makes the Pershing shoot slower. 2. No, does not out range the Panther lmao. It has the same exact range as a Tiger (45 range). 3. It's main cannon rounds are almost no different than a Tiger lol. I proved it in this thread already. 4. Yes... it fires a 90 munitions round that phases through vehicles at times, even on a direct hit. 5. Um... a frontal MG. I'm not sure where you're getting at with this. 6. Right, it has a grenade throwing ability which is completely useless against vehicles and mediocre vs infantry. And you said you use this commander lol. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Are Rangers worth it?10 Mar 2016, 01:06 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2016, 02:41 AMWhat Doth Life?! Riflemen have a target size of .97 while Ranger have .8 and they also regenerate health outside of combat at veterancy two. Other than that I think they're a total bullshit unit. All they do is throw a standard grenade and get Thompsons... Wow Relic, you really went deep in the think tank coming up with this P2W commander They are totally generic and uninspired and their unit description labels them as "marksmanship experts" while they spawn with M1 Carbines and can get Thompsons. I would say Paratroopers are strictly better, but they have a target size of one which can be rough. I used to think Para's were better than Rangers, but then I realized Rangers reinforce around 3 times faster than a Para squad. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic's Tendencies9 Mar 2016, 08:04 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2016, 18:29 PMKharn Why did they remove the crew? you tell me, look at how many games people were jumping out of the calliope to get 3-5 of them out just for shits and giggles. They removed the crew so the calliopes couldn't self repair anymore. The crew had absolutely nothing to do with the amount of calliopes fielded. Relic could have easily put a limit on the numbers of calliopes itself and not removed the crew. So why they chose to remove the crew instead of limiting the calliopes to only 2 is beyond me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are Rangers worth it?9 Mar 2016, 00:41 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2016, 23:11 PMGreenDevil Does anyone use Rangers, when Rifles perform quite well at the same thing, which is AI? 400MP and 100 Muni seems quite steep for such a fragile unit. Is there any scope (hope) that they could come standard with zooks, then they might be a little more versatile? Rifles are better at long range. Rangers are better at close range, obviously. Yes, they perform quite well for their cost. If you want a volk shreck blob wiped, just get a ranger squad. Rifle are good, but they will rarely ever wipe any squads if the opponent has good micro. Rangers can just chew apart anything that doesn't hit retreat by the time they're in their face. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Anvil Churchill could use a SLIGHT buff8 Mar 2016, 03:51 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2016, 03:42 AMGumboot Downside to that would be it would most likely go to who got the final hit and nothing worse then seeing an allied get it when you put in 99% of the effort and at the moment that only really goes towards the CPs let alone if your units got 0xp gained from all the hard work. Fairly easy to check for player damage and reward whoever did the most damage when the unit is killed. Lots of games do this. In: COH2 Balance