Then you're a rare specie, nobody use Sherman on 2vs2 from top to average players.
You know this from all your experience in such matches?
P4s have better scatter which works better in that condition.
Eh, no they don't. Even the P4J has worse scatter than the HE Sherman. It has 6 scatter angle and 5.5 distance max compared to 6.5/5.54 max for the P4J and a significantly worse 7.5/6.4 for the P4H.
And the HE Sherman has a way better AOE profile on top of that with 15.6 AOE score vs 8.4 and 5.1.
Looking and responding only at pure AI performance (and under certain specific circumstances) and not the overall situation between T34 and Sherman is exactly what lead all of us in this situation. USF balance is a failure at the moment and Scott-Path meta just the result of it.
You always talk a lot of shit for someone who only plays one faction and isn't even highly ranked with it.
People were comparing the AI power of both vehicles, that's why I responded in regards to their AI power only.
USF is doing fine since the recent patches with 52/51/50/47% win ratios across all game modes respectively. The issue with balancing their 4v4 performance inherently comes down to the fact that Relic decided not to give them stock rocket arty, which is something we couldn't fix as we weren't allowed to put the Calliope in the basic roster. The commanders that bring heavy indirect (Priest, Calliope or Paths with Scotts) will always be meta because of this. UKF has the same exact issue.