Profile of Mr Carmine

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1289

General Information


Thread: Zis Barrage is broken !28 Mar 2019, 19:29 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2019, 19:22 PMTaksin02 35 Now Sometime I rather build ZIS than a mortar because its fire faster and more accurate to force enemy MG out of the building. +1 the 82mm mortar rarely are able to force off a team weapon. It misses often. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS 2 is kidding me27 Mar 2019, 13:11 PM The rof and accuracy of the is2 are horrendeus when compared to the tiger. If the i2s should match the tiger in durability its rof and acc should be made to match it as well. As right now the is2 is fine imo. Its extremely durable but is inaccurate and fires very slowly. The tiger is less durable but has good concitant acc with higher rof. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Volks Incendiary Grenade7 Mar 2019, 10:20 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2019, 09:43 AMVipper Imo the reason why Soviet/USF/UKF had to be buffed was that OKW where OP nerfing OKW is the way to start reducing the power level of early allied infatry. I completely agree here. Imo spot on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility28 Feb 2019, 09:49 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2019, 08:15 AMinsaneHoshi I dont think any squad has the requisite 80-120 DPS to drop 2-3 conscript models by the time the animation ends, doubly so when said squad has to dodge said animation. And it is cheaper than the volks one. Having a squad with more members that's less likely to be wiped by explosives? Tough life. Volks dont tech specificly for it. Sprint is often used in combination with molly or at nade because of their short range. Taking that into acount the molly is imo not cheaper A full health squad can drop 2 models for a single molly easyely. When already damaged it can be 3 or more. A larger squad is less likely to wiped by explosives indeed. But a smaller squad has an easier time avoiding the blast of say grenades. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility27 Feb 2019, 08:50 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2019, 04:05 AMdistrofio I have never said that, thats your own opinion about OKM, not mine. I just pointed out how doctrinally SU gives more variety. Yeah lets spam sturmpios... looses at min5 and ragequits. I am not even taking consideration of bad plays, so i excluse as A VIABLE OPTION to use NON COMBATANT troops as a FRONTLINE unit. But if you do, fine! Gl winning games tho. If you pick a doctrine that do not upgrades cons, it means you do not rely on them after min 5. Its simple mafs. But Again volks vs cons is not only a broken comparison, a everlasting repeated one, a one i said im ignoring until cons get fixed (everyone here agrees cons need a buff) and finally as long as penals can (and they do) beat volks the comparison is valid, as i stated the limits of my comparison and i did not mention nothing about cost efficiency, just how that argument backfires. Where in my sentence does it say that i think okw is doctrine depended? Where did i say spam sturms instead of volks? You simply ignore them. Sturms are non combat troops? 2x sturm opening can be very hard for the enemy to deal with. You will disrupt him so much while you gain map control with volks or kubel. Try doing that with 2x of other factions engineer units. Cons power is supposed to be their utility. Wich falls off almost completley after x minutes. Buff that for the late game. Or make them more cost efficient. Right now they are not cost efficient. Nor are they the best at utility. Only when the right doctrine is chosen they are. A unit depending so much on doctrines and side tech and requiering massive micro to get the most out off while having simaler cost is just wrong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility26 Feb 2019, 14:51 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2019, 02:22 AMdistrofio What about the call-in part? Did you missed it "accidentaly" AGAIN? I dont think so... For the "Mr reading comprehension" is pretty ironic you cant do it for yourself, but dont worry i got you covered, again. As for spec-ops are infantry but not mainline inf, so does partisans (but not spec-ops, more like a disposable squad) so yeah. You have your options but not for mainline if, in case you forgot (volks for early and obers for late) so my point stands pretty much the same. "Hey look, i added NON COMBATANT UNITS to the formula!" And again you forgot you have 2xPartisans, AT conscripts (with totally new abilities), Ppsh cons(again repruposed and new abilities), Repair cons, a SNIPER (yeah it wreaks havok to OST and counts). Sadly for OKM they cant choose other but volks for early or Pfusiliers given you picked its doctrine, but hey SU can pick pretty much any squad and get quite a lot of benefit, the only underwhelming case is non upgraded cons, so again you just shot your own feet. OKM call ins are mutually exclusive, what means you get only one and nothing more. But SU can get 2 or more call ins infantries with some cons upgrade packages, again, extra points for SU in versatility. OKW: Volks AND Obers OR Fusis OR JLI OR Falchirms. SOV: Cons++ AND Penals AND snipers OR Guards OR Assault Guards OR Shocks OR Partisans X2. Im not even adding support weapon call ins. SOV already outnumbers a lot in this topic. Again i dont understand why do you bother in talking back. Fun thing is you pick penals vs volks and its the other way around. GJ getting backfired again. Also volks only doctrinal upgrade assault package, But cons that get AT package, PPsH package, Repair ability, Hit the dirt!. (1 upgrade vs 4) 1. Really sad that you try to portay okw as being heavely doctrine dependent. There is more then volks or fussies. You purposely leave out sturms and the kubel, a feul free vehicle. That you only spam volks is on you. 2. And your point is? All off them are good enough. 3. Again you forget sturms for okw, but then you do count the su sniper. Why are you even posting? Sov have so much callin inf and teams because all off their non doc inf and wpn teams except penals are not as effective as other factions counterparts are. Despite being a little more durable. 4. Cons have a lot off utility indeed but half is in doctrines and thus exclude eachother. Their scaling also is doctrinal depended. Volks dont need any doctrine for any off that and do more then cons. With cons you pay for what you cant get, about a third off that utility is not available at the same time. And they also pay more for basic utility. For 10 mp more volks wreck cons and its fine. For 50 mp more plus tech structure and you are suprised penals beat volks? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The new Penals19 Feb 2019, 18:40 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2019, 18:32 PMPorygon Buttom it, or it hit a mine, blob into the damaged tank and throw sticky satchel. That's fine? Tellers one shotting all light is somehow. Wich can win you the game. Buttoning and satchaling actually requires a lot of mirco and recources. Tellers are just put in place for i believe 50 muni and hope for the best. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Conscript Utility15 Feb 2019, 07:43 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2019, 05:52 AMdistrofio Wait a moment, are you working on relic? Do you really know the prupose of cons and never told anyone? Having a unit that is meant to fall short or be replaced in late game, do generaly not have equal or greater costs. So how does that make cons expendable? Cons have investments and doc abilities for late game. But only 2 are relevant. And only 1 of those wich is doctrinal makes up for or buffs their lacking combat power in the late game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility15 Feb 2019, 04:00 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2019, 00:24 AMdistrofio Your text.. Because they are meant to... OMG ppl never learn If this was the case cons should have been cheaper from the start. Molly and at nade would not have been sidectech. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscript Utility14 Feb 2019, 20:56 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Feb 2019, 20:02 PMdistrofio YhEA BoI, COmPENsaTE... First volks, now grens... this kind of discussions with no sense or whatsoever are very repetitive and are not even funny anymore. Haters gonna hate. No one really speaks for cons here... /Thread Most people believe cons them self are fine until late game. That is where they fall short period. Only snaring is their job then. Their utility becomes almost irrelevant, it doesnt scale. Sandbags are gone in seconds. Merge in late game wont cost you the squad if your lucky. when throwing the molly, cons only get less wrecked at max vet or forced off before they can use it. Tripwires rarely used even less then ost med kits. Oorah and at nade are the only 2 to remain usefull. But eat your munitions. The other (good) utility is spread in doctrines. 40% acc buff on low acc to start with amounts to less vet buffs of other high accuracy units. vet 3 0.71 recc acc only helps a bit vs acc buffs and ai upgrades of the enemy. At vet 0 cons have no chance to compete in the late game. Other mains do due to ai upgrades. I do agree with dark that a single payment off 60 muni weapon upgrade beats sandbags and muni per pop oorah and at nade combo in late game. Just reduce the cost as the tiers get build In: COH2 Balance