Profile of NorthFireZ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID United States
Posts: 211

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/alongcameaspider
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/andywong545/featured?view_as=subscriber
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Show Latest Posts


Thread: 1000 IQ USF fix12 Nov 2019, 18:53 PM Engine crit right now is probably a massively underused ability since it practically requires the sacrifice of the Stuart. We could give the Stuart Crit shot like the AEC instead of engine crit as an ability. This could make the Stuart more survivable and viable vs stuff like Pumas and P4s but doesn't increase its ability to solely kill those units because its main gun should still do 80 damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mortar Pit Split12 Nov 2019, 18:13 PM I kind of like this idea. While some people might disagree on the price, this would literally be killed with a flame nade and a couple rifle shots. The reason why the Mortar pit was so powerful was its fire rate with duo mortars. A single mortar that can't retreat is not OP. We aren't talking about a Leig or a Pack Howi. What would make this even more fair is to give this single mortar the same target size as the double mortar and the same build time for Engineers. I got another suggestion though. What if you split the mortar costs between munitions. For example: Regular Mortar Pit with one mortar active for 250 manpower. Then, for 80 munitions, unlock the second mortar. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rifle company rework suggestion5 Nov 2019, 22:39 PM What's the Mg upgrade cost for Ez8 right now? Is it 75 munitions or something? If it's higher than other shermans then I'd say by all means bring it down. Also the only thing I would change is the RE flamers. It's certainly not worth the entire slot (Same thing with brit flamers. Not worth an entire commander slot) Without reworking everything I probably would enter the M3 into that slot. A bit of a half track support is never a bad thing. Would be better if it came with a squad of cav rifles inside In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Retreat Received Accuracy To Received Damage5 Nov 2019, 19:07 PM Would this make vehicle wipes a lot more common? Tank shells missing retreating squads is beneficial rather than reduced damage? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?31 Oct 2019, 17:10 PM I'm actually okay with the unit as it is right with the exception of the strafing run. Maybe bring down the cost to 40 munitions much like a Pyrosection arty flare. Airborne doctrine is already really munition based so any cost reduction would be a pretty good buff. In: Lobby
Thread: UKF nerfs when29 Oct 2019, 16:49 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2019, 15:28 PMullumulu it is true that the 17pdr is BS strong since it is nondoc, has brace, has flares and can shot through shotblockers with some muni...it is a better pak43 which need no doc That's why it's built in all levels of competitive play right? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ideas For Improving The UK Faction22 Oct 2019, 17:26 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2019, 15:40 PMSander93 For the record, vehicle MGs do not deal that much damage late game, because they do not scale with veterancy (they get no accuracy bonus, meaning that as enemy infantry gets lower Received Accuracy, the MGs deal less damage) and abundant yellow cover (craters everywhere) means they almost permanently deal 50% less damage. Tank MGs only shine in the late mid game into early late game when tanks first start appearing. Furthermore while UKF tanks do have worse MGs than other factions' tanks, they usually have other traits in return. The Cromwell and Comet are very fast and agile, and the Cromwell has a very good potential shock timing (235 fuel, or 270 fuel with Bolster). The Churchill has 1400 health. Buffing the MGs on these tanks to Panzer IV / T-34 levels would risk giving them too much shock value. I personally think UKF tanks are pretty much fine right now. The Churchill is still good, the Comet is good now, the Centaur is great, and the Cromwell is good as long as you can get it out early. Cromwell has about twice the Infantry kill time in comparison to the P4. Cromwell MG definitely needs to be better. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brits in 1v1 is a joke22 Oct 2019, 02:44 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2019, 01:20 AMKiwiBirb Tactical flexibility Terrible on the move Cannot build free sandbags or trenches Grenade that doesn’t help when flanking or against charging units Poor survivability >Faust on every squad. >Grenade without a timer >Excellent pool of upgrades including G43, Vet Leader, and LMG >Currently has 20%d damage reduction at Vet3 >Better than IS on the move and out of cover. I'd say Grens are far better generalists for a cheaper cost. The only thing they can't do is out shoot IS in two very specific situations: Green vs Green cover at long range. Build Sandbags. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fixing UKF: Remove bolster?20 Oct 2019, 07:35 AM They could have pushed 5 man after either unlocking AEC or Bofor tech. Or even after T3 tech. I always thought it was timing problem because for everyone it was their first upgrade. I'd rather take the revert and delay the 5man. Or keep the dps curve and remove the RA negatives. I don't think Bren Guns are weak. I think Piats are weak although I don't have the stats fo back it up. (apprently they don't have good accuracy or something?) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Give universal carrier the 222 treatment20 Oct 2019, 07:19 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2019, 03:44 AMdistrofio If lavanades are an anti garrison tool, so are UKF pyro IS howitzer flare, just saying Nani the fuck In: COH2 Balance