Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: Why is there so much crying over Maxim spam?18 Sep 2019, 11:13 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 11:11 AMVipper PLS define MG-42 spam, how many MG-42 do you consider spam? Same criteria i use for maxim spams... 3 to 4 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is there so much crying over Maxim spam?18 Sep 2019, 11:10 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 10:44 AMblvckdream Because it is a fucking retarded strat to play against? I mean hes right about one thing... why all the tears against maxims being spammed when as of the moment (and for the past 2 years) mg42 spams are a tad more cancerous than maxims? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is there so much crying over Maxim spam?18 Sep 2019, 10:40 AM Because axis players especially those with names of generals or fieldmarshals are usually scrubs and cry op the moment they cant amove to win In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim Overperforming18 Sep 2019, 10:38 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 00:19 AMcochosgo Maxim is fine. If you have troubles as okw get a kubel to get sight. The thing still needs to engage from as much distance as posible to guarantee effective supression. Which is fine by me. Its not a unit that can do its work on its own. Its no longer a useless mg, and its ability, if used with vision and anticipation its a good tool. Ps its single unit suppression is unchanged... its still the worst mg ingame for some dumb reason In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The maxim vs mg42 argument18 Sep 2019, 10:36 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2019, 05:54 AMGI John 412 MG42’s are a core part of how the game is balanced since day one of the vCoH beta. It’s supposed to be better, that’s the whole point. Axis sets up and supports the MG42 while Allies scout, flank and attack. Allied MGs can’t be as good unless you let Axis infantry be as good. Then you end up with homogenization and factions like OKW that struggle to remain balanced and playable. The game is in a really good spot right now and doesn’t need massive changes to the HMG dynamic. Minor adjustments to the Maxim would be fine but are honestly not necessary for the game to be balanced and fun. (US vCoH M1917A1 .30 cal MGs were basically never used but vCoH was still, and still is, balanced and fun.) Not exactly true in the soviet vs wehrmacht matchup... grens and conscripts are fairly even in the matchup but the mg42 far outclasses the maxim.... If we were to make your interpretation correct then conscripts require buffa to be "superior" to grenadiers as you claimed... Anyways the real best way to fix this is just to buff the maxim to hmg42 levels of viability and be done with it... unless you are going to claim that conscripts somehow outclass grenadiers... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why doesnt relic publish the current unit stats?17 Sep 2019, 22:32 PM this post should be pinned or smth In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjäger is very OP!17 Sep 2019, 22:06 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2019, 21:58 PMStug life as i said i don't mid to literally copy pasted any allied para troop unit or you could make them a commando clone In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjäger is very OP!17 Sep 2019, 21:23 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2019, 21:22 PMStug life make them six men then remove the snare airborne guards and shocks dont get camo and a nukenade... they get a regular nade and no camo at all... also with the exception of upgraded guards no elite infantry gets a snare afaik In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjäger is very OP!17 Sep 2019, 21:20 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2019, 20:41 PMdistrofio If i were say "apples are red", why do you bother asking me "So YoUR ArgUmEnT Is StRaBerRyS aRe Not ReD!??" Stop trolling putting words on other peoples mouths... and stop repeating what other people say. though correlation may not necessitate causation... causation does necessitate correlation angry rants may not mean something is OP... but if something is OP it will definitely cause a degree of angry rants... Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2019, 20:09 PMdistrofio But increasing the cost of falls should help to make them more balanced in all PoV. If that were to happen snares should stay, because you are paying for a elite doctrinal mainline infantry replacement. airborne guards and shocks dont get snares... why should falls get them? they already have camo and a nukenade In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Inconsistencies, some required changes17 Sep 2019, 20:50 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2019, 11:50 AMBalanced_Gamer OKW -MG34 does not suppress consistently enough according to some (quite cruide) calculations the MG-34 does quite alot of suppression https://www.coh2.org/topic/97807/the-maxim-vs-mg42-argument/page/2 Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2019, 11:50 AMBalanced_Gamer -Should have snares available already in the beginning. This is the only faction to get AT earliest which dampens their AI early significantly even more than it should. It is really necessary for them to have snares early as they already nerfed most of the early game elements. Nerfs more than stated according to charts. Little has been done to improve mid gameplay in contrast since Battlegroup is in a worse state than before. fine but the T0 rakaten needs to be bumped up in timing and made costlier In: COH2 Balance