Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: OKW buildings and resources upon cancellation6 Oct 2018, 09:35 AM the solution is simple really... dont reimburse OKW resources when they cancel their HQ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW buildings and resources upon cancellation6 Oct 2018, 08:42 AM ive had a game where this guy simply builds an OKW T4 HQ... but fucks up his placement and gets satcheled... and simply cancels it to regain his lost resources and waste my satchel like a get out of jail free card... i find this stupid to be honest... if you placed your HQ there and have been outplayed to the point where i satchel your HQ... you better damn lose your HQ along with your fuel and resources... not cancel it to reimburse resources like a get out of jail free card... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: German infantry doctrine rework is so OP6 Oct 2018, 06:35 AM Tbh the main problem here imo are the 5 man flamepios and the utility pgrens... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce the cost of tier 46 Oct 2018, 00:01 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 19:25 PMTobis He's trolling you or delusional, not worth arguing. Let it go. trying to disprove bullshit is trolling? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce the cost of tier 45 Oct 2018, 23:48 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 So I am the biased one? You do realize, that a scout car hasn't the same priority as T2? While a scout car is nice and dandy with Flamers in it it is no must-have. That is different with T2. Without Pak 40 you are screwed against Tanks of every kind and without Flametruck/222 you will lack a lot of AI power. Not building a damn scout car hasn't even near the same effect as not building T2 So just because I don't want to make the best fraction in game even more OP I am biased? tbh i find the scout car a useful tool for flanking and flaming out targets or inflicting bleed upon ostheer or chasing out and satcheling that nasty flamer HT... its use as a mobile garrison for infantry cannot be understated even vs ostheer imo Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 But OST without T2 has a lot of AT options right? (And you know what a Zis 3 is? You don't need to go T1) sov going T1 has only 1 more AT option against OST going T2... and thats running around with a scout car with PTRS penals... meanwhile ost has tellers... Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 Nice strawman you got there. Never said I wanted OST to have cheaper theching. All I did was pointing out, that a T 34 after 220 fuel would be broken as garden and that OST teching IS already More expensive than SU one. OST: T1/10 F + BP1/40 F + T2/20 F + BP2/ 90 + T3/15 F = 175 F SU: T1/10 F/ T2/20 F + T3/ 85 F + T4/ 90 F = 185/195 F your argument is self contradictory... and since u did it without a T2 skip it proves that OST teching is cheaper... Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 Don't let your tanks be without support ... you said it yourself in another thread. Pz 4 won't have an easy game against T 34 + Penals + Cons (or Zis 3) + Mines this is a given... but the P4 has an advantage provided the T-34 doesnt ram and satchel... Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 OST needs 10! fuel less to reach T3! Than SU needs to reach T4. So much to the hurr durr "ridiculously cheaper" proves my point... ost teching is cheaper... youre contradicting yourself Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 OST: 175 F + 222/ 30 F + 251/ 30 F + Pz 4/ 120 F = 355 F Till Pz 4 SU: 185/195 + T70/ 70 Fuel + T34 / 90 F = 345/355 F Till T 34 if we add all that we also add in the m3a1 and factor in T2 builds SU: 185 + M3a1/15 fuel + T70/ 70 Fuel + T34 / 90 F = 355 F Till T 34 T2 build SU: 195 + molly/15 fuel + AT grenade/ 25 fuel + T70/ 70 Fuel + T34 / 90 F = 395!!! F Till T 34 dont get me started on a t1-t2 build... Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 So you claim again, that Pz 4 comes earlyer (assuming that you skip T 70 since you claimed, that even then Pz 4 comes earlyer) even tho I showed you 3 times already, that this is not true lets imply a T2 skip/scout car skip for both sides... absolutely no vehicles fielded till p4/T-34 since both T1s moderately helpless against them... OST to P4 = T1 (10 fuel) + BP1 (40 fuel) + BP2 (90 fuel) + T3 (15 fuel) + Panzer 4 (125 fuel)=280 fuel SU to T-34 = T1 (10 fuel) / T2 (20 fuel) T3 (85 fuel) + T4 (90 fuel) = 275/280 fuel ... unless either of us are doing calculation mistakes it means the T-34 and P4 come at the exact same time correct?... what i find most peculiar is the fact that a 90 fuel tank comes at the same time as a 120 fuel tank... if you think this is a good thing then make that your argument and stop claiming the T34 comes later or sov techs for less Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 "I already have T 70 on the field during a time where my enemy can't do much against him except using AT guns but i also want my first medium tank to arrive sooner, even tho he already does" ... and btw. Did you know that you can use T 70 to kill his 222/251 and capture both fuels? Your T 34 will then comes even more earlyer than his Pz 4 + you will have T 34 + T 70 + Support and he only Pz 4 + Support at-cars are soo much better at killing 251s believe me... but yes... but argument that the T-34 coming earlier than the P4 is complete bullshit and thats what im trying to disprove Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 18:47 PMmr.matrix300 So just because I don't want to make the best fraction in game even more OP I am biased? that should have been your argument... to try to show me how it would break the game not claim the T-34 comes earlier or that ost teching comes cheaper... because that argument is completely bullshit if you think that ost teching being cheaper is good for the meta then argue there... dont try to prove that SOV teching is cheaper bcz its not... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce the cost of tier 45 Oct 2018, 17:55 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 15:18 PMmr.matrix300 How so? 275 F - 90 F = 185 F (till you reach T4 as SU). 295 F - 120 F = 175 F (till you reach T3 as OST) --> You need 10 fuel more to reach T4 as SU than OST needs to reach T3 So the Pz 4 would come at the same time as T 34 ... but guess what? You would have 0 AT capability in case of enemy getting T 70 and even if he woudln't go for T70/ SU 76, then it would be still hard to deal with a T 34 with a Pz 4 alone and you would have no Sdkfz 222/251 to support your infantry either. You know that someone is baised when he demands to get a T 34 after 220 fuel while OKW and OST get Pz 4 after 295(OST) and 315/335 (OKW)Fuel ... If OST rushes for Pz 4, then just get T 70. Or use penals. He won't have 222/251 to counter your infantry nor Pak 40 to counter T 70 Oh yea sure ... lets add Soviet Scout car but ignore 222/251 to make it look like SU needs to spend more in teching up And sidetech for mortar ??? What if you would just go either T1 OR T2 under normal circumstances like every other SU player too? And btw. we can play the same game for OKW too ... now we have got 3*15 + 25 + 45 + 120 + 140 (375) fuel for Pz 4 ... but yet you demand a 220 fuel T 34. So till the OKW player rolls his first Pz 4 out you almost got your 3rd T 34 Bias 11/10 1. it means it takes less fuel for OST to get out the SUPERIOR panzer 4 to the T-34 also you forgot to add the M3 to the sov calculation bringing it to 290 fuel... if you wish to add T2 then add the m3 aswell... 1st bias detected 2. and sov has even less AT to deal with the P4 outside of ramming it and using penals to satchel it to smithereens... its effective but soo is a p4 against the T-34 without support... your argument? 2nd bias detected 3. the SOV T-34 is inferior to the P4... i find it odd that it comes earlier thanks to teching being expensive as fuck... OST gets to field a P4 which costs 125 fuel faster than a 90 fuel T-34 because its teching is ridiculously cheaper... 235 fuel makes sure that the teching cost for the 2 factions are even... if you want to OST to have cheaper teching then you are admitting your bias... 3rd potential bias spotted 4. mmkay ill ignore the scout car in the fuel cost... but only if ignore T2 in teching... or are you too biased to ignore it? either way you lose as T2 is more expensive than an m3a1... bias number 4 detected 5. mmkay since you want to add the 222/251 lets add the T-70 as the appropriate counter... guess which faction is gonna get their medium out even longer? ps its not the soviets... bias number 5 spotted conclusion... all your statements are biased... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: "balancing" discussions are ALL pointless5 Oct 2018, 03:21 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 03:07 AMLoopDloop Idk how to stream or if we will even have a rematch but I can add you on steam for the spectating thing. Addendum: if it’s against forum rules to challenge 1v1s in threads like this I’ll stop though. Not tryna get banned. Hmmm add me on steam and i think you invite to watch? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: "balancing" discussions are ALL pointless5 Oct 2018, 02:59 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 02:49 AMLoopDloop Yeah well earlier in the thread he kept talking about how he beat me (while I was meming) and that I need to l2p, conflating an experiment of a dumb strategy (1 riflemen ffs) with me actually trying. So I do want to “1v1 him bro”. Incendiary rounds kept on bragging about how pro he was because he beat loopdloop in a meme match.... hey loop would it be ok if i spectate ur rematch with incendiaryrounds? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Idea to fix brit lack of lategame indirect fire5 Oct 2018, 00:53 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Oct 2018, 21:47 PMdistrofio and here you are again... exagerating things to extreme. I find mortar pits in a proper spot, they have the inconvenience of immobility. Wich makes them really hard to choose its final destination. Yet sturdy to most trheats, other mortars and also some stray infantry trying to wipe them. Compare that to mobile mortars and you just cant argue me. Actually losing a mortar squad is a rarity outside of 4v4 clowngames with shitloads of rocketarty firing... i have however punished many brit players making mortar pits via incendiary nades... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reduce the cost of tier 45 Oct 2018, 00:50 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2018, 00:35 AMTobis Lets just agree you all suck. Hey dont look at me... i never fought this guy... he just sent me a replay of him beating a top 90 usf player (dapope) with an mg42 spam and claiming that he was a pro... In: COH2 Balance